LD 1526
pg. 24
Page 23 of 118 An Act To Enact the Uniform Parentage Act and Conforming Amendments and Additio... Page 25 of 118
Download Bill Text
LR 134
Item 1

 
parentage litigation, in a fashion similar to the acknowledgment of
paternity process provided in subchapter 3. Acknowledgment
pursuant to this section reduces the time in which the parentage of
the nonmarital presumed parent can be factually challenged to two
years after the filing of the acknowledgment. Failure to
acknowledge, or failure to get a court adjudication of parentage by
the nonmarital presumed parent eliminates the need to give that
person notice of the commencement of child protection proceedings,
termination of parental rights proceedings, guardianship and
adoption proceedings. However, that person may ask the court for
permission to intervene and participate in those proceedings.
Finally, the failure of the nonmarital presumed parent to
acknowledge or be adjudicated may permit the expedited paternity
process to take place without notice to the nonmarital parent,
without however, disestablishing that person's parentage.

 
SUBCHAPTER 3

 
VOLUNTARY ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF PATERNITY

 
Comment

 
Voluntary acknowledgment of paternity has long been an
alternative to a contested paternity suit. Under UPA (1973) § 4,
the inclusion of a man's name on the child's birth certificate
created a presumption of paternity, which could be rebutted. In
order to improve the collection of child support, especially from
unwed fathers, the U.S. Congress mandated a fundamental change in
the acknowledgment procedure. The Personal Responsibility and
Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996 (PRWORA, also known
as the Welfare Reform Act) conditions receipt of federal child
support enforcement funds on state enactment of laws that greatly
strengthen the effect of a man's voluntary acknowledgment of
paternity, 42 U.S.C. § 666(a)(5)(C). This statute is reproduced
in Appendix: Federal IV-D Statute Relating to Parentage, infra.
In brief, it provides that a valid, unrescinded, unchallenged
acknowledgment of paternity is to be treated as equivalent to a
judicial determination of paternity.

 
Because in many respects the federal act is nonspecific, the
new UPA contains clear and comprehensive procedures to comply
with the federal mandate. Primary among the factual circumstances
that Congress did not take into account was that a married woman
may consent to an acknowledgement of paternity by a man who may
indeed be her child's genetic father, but is not her husband.
Under the new UPA, the mother's husband is the presumed father of
the child, see § 204, supra. By ignoring the real possibility
that the child will have both an acknowledged father and a


Page 23 of 118 Top of Page Page 25 of 118