|
parentage litigation, in a fashion similar to the acknowledgment of | paternity process provided in subchapter 3. Acknowledgment | pursuant to this section reduces the time in which the parentage of | the nonmarital presumed parent can be factually challenged to two | years after the filing of the acknowledgment. Failure to | acknowledge, or failure to get a court adjudication of parentage by | the nonmarital presumed parent eliminates the need to give that | person notice of the commencement of child protection proceedings, | termination of parental rights proceedings, guardianship and | adoption proceedings. However, that person may ask the court for | permission to intervene and participate in those proceedings. | Finally, the failure of the nonmarital presumed parent to | acknowledge or be adjudicated may permit the expedited paternity | process to take place without notice to the nonmarital parent, | without however, disestablishing that person's parentage. |
|
| VOLUNTARY ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF PATERNITY |
|
| | Voluntary acknowledgment of paternity has long been an | alternative to a contested paternity suit. Under UPA (1973) § 4, | the inclusion of a man's name on the child's birth certificate | created a presumption of paternity, which could be rebutted. In | order to improve the collection of child support, especially from | unwed fathers, the U.S. Congress mandated a fundamental change in | the acknowledgment procedure. The Personal Responsibility and | Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996 (PRWORA, also known | as the Welfare Reform Act) conditions receipt of federal child | support enforcement funds on state enactment of laws that greatly | strengthen the effect of a man's voluntary acknowledgment of | paternity, 42 U.S.C. § 666(a)(5)(C). This statute is reproduced | in Appendix: Federal IV-D Statute Relating to Parentage, infra. | In brief, it provides that a valid, unrescinded, unchallenged | acknowledgment of paternity is to be treated as equivalent to a | judicial determination of paternity. |
|
| | Because in many respects the federal act is nonspecific, the | new UPA contains clear and comprehensive procedures to comply | with the federal mandate. Primary among the factual circumstances | that Congress did not take into account was that a married woman | may consent to an acknowledgement of paternity by a man who may | indeed be her child's genetic father, but is not her husband. | Under the new UPA, the mother's husband is the presumed father of | the child, see § 204, supra. By ignoring the real possibility | that the child will have both an acknowledged father and a |
|
|