LD 1526
pg. 25
Page 24 of 118 An Act To Enact the Uniform Parentage Act and Conforming Amendments and Additio... Page 26 of 118
Download Bill Text
LR 134
Item 1

 
presumed father, Congress left it to the states to sort out which
of the men should be recognized as the legal father.

 
Further, PRWORA does not require that a man acknowledging
paternity must assert genetic paternity of the child. Section 301
is designed to prevent circumvention of adoption laws by
requiring a sworn assertion of genetic parentage of the child.

 
Sections 302-305 clarify that, if a child has a presumed
father, that man must file a denial of paternity in conjunction
with another man's acknowledgment of paternity in order for the
acknowledgement to be valid. If the presumed father is unwilling
to cooperate, or his whereabouts are unknown, a court proceeding
is necessary to resolve the issue of parentage.

 
Congress also directed that the acknowledgment can be
"rescinded" within a particular timeframe, and subsequently can
be "challenged" without stating a timeframe. Those procedures are
dealt with in §§ 307-309.

 
Finally, the related issue of issuance or revision of birth
certificates is left to other state law.

 
§1851.__Acknowledgment of paternity

 
The mother of a child and a man claiming to be the genetic
father of the child may sign an acknowledgment of paternity with
intent to establish the man's paternity.

 
Comment

 
(This is section 301 of the UPA.)

 
Source: 42 U.S.C. § 666(a)(5)(C), see preceding Comment and
Appendix: Federal IV-D Statute Relating to Parentage, infra.

 
PRWORA does not explicitly require that a man acknowledging
parentage necessarily is asserting his genetic parentage of the
child. In order to prevent circumvention of adoption laws, § 301
corrects this omission by requiring a sworn assertion of genetic
parentage of the child. A 2002 amendment provides that a man who
signs an acknowledgment of paternity declares that he is the
genetic father of the child. Thus both the man and the mother
acknowledge his paternity, under penalty of perjury, without
requiring the parents to spell out the details of their sexual
relations. Further, the amended language also takes into account
a situation in which a man, who is unable to have sexual
intercourse with his partner, may still have contributed to the
conception of the child through the use of his own sperm.
Henceforth, a man in
that situation will be able to recognize


Page 24 of 118 Top of Page Page 26 of 118