dealers commonly give a certain amount of advice to their |
customers in the course of their regular business, and that |
it would be inappropriate to bring them within the scope of |
the Investment Advisers Act merely because of this aspect of |
their business. On the other hand, that portion of clause |
[(C)] which refers to 'special compensation' amounts to an |
equally clear recognition that a broker or dealer who is |
specially compensated for the rendition of advice should be |
considered an investment adviser and not be excluded from |
the purview of the Act merely because he is also engaged in |
effecting market transactions in securities. . . . The |
essential distinction to be borne in mind in considering |
borderline cases . . . is the distinction between |
compensation for advice itself and compensation for services |
of another character to which advice is merely incidental. |