| | 14. Section 102(12): Insurance company: No Prior Provision. | This definition is based on Securities Act of 1933 Section | 2(a)(13). |
|
| | 15. Section 102(13): Insured: Prior Provision: RUSA Section | 401(a)(2). The RUSA definition of "insured," which was solely | applicable to exempt securities, applied to the insurance of "all | or substantially all of principal, interest, or dividends." | Section 102(13) is applicable generally but is limited to | "payment of all principal and all interest." |
|
| | 16. Section 102(14): International banking institution: No | Prior Provision. Securities issued or guaranteed by the | International Bank for Reconstruction and Development, 22 U.S.C. | Section 286k-1(a); the Inter-American Development Bank, 22 U.S.C. | Section 283h(a); the Asian Development Bank, 22 U.S.C. Section | 285h(a); the African Development Bank, 22 U.S.C. Section 290i-9; | and the International Finance Corporation, see 22 U.S.C. Section | 282k; are treated as exempt securities under Section 3(a)(2) of | the Securities Act of 1933, see generally 3 Louis Loss & Joel | Seligman, Securities Regulation 1191-1194 (3d ed. rev. 1999), and | are within this term. |
|
| | 17. Section 102(15): Investment adviser: Prior Provisions: | 1956 Act Section 401(f); RUSA Section 101(7). This term generally | follows the definition in Section 202(a)(11) of the Investment | Advisers Act of 1940, but has been updated to take into account | new media such as the Internet. |
|
| | The first sentence in Section 102(15) is identical to the | first sentence in the 1956 Act Section 401(f) and the counterpart | language in Section 202(a)(11). The RUSA definition deleted the | phrases "either directly or through publications or writings" and | "regular" before business. These terms have been returned to | Section 102(15) because of the intention that this definition be | construed uniformly with the definition in Section 202(a)(11) of | the Investment Advisers Act of 1940. This first sentence would | not reach the author of a book who did not receive compensation | as part of a regular business for providing investment advice. |
|
| | The second sentence in the term addressing financial planners | is new. The purpose of this sentence is to achieve functional | regulation of financial planners who satisfy the definition of | investment adviser. Cf. Investment Advisers Act Release 1092, 39 | SEC Dock. 494 (1987) (similar approach in Securities and Exchange | Commission interpretative Release). This reference is not | intended to preclude persons who hold a formally recognized | financial planning or consulting designation or certification | from using this designation. The use by a person of a title, | designation or certification as a financial planner or |
|
|