This section is the correlative of the continuing, exclusive |
jurisdiction asserted in the preceding section. It makes the |
relatively subtle distinction between the CEJ "to modify a |
support order" established in Section 205 and the "continuing |
jurisdiction to enforce" established in this section. A |
keystone of UIFSA is that the power to enforce the order of |
the issuing State is not "exclusive" with that State. Rather, |
on request one or more responding States may also exercise |
authority to enforce the order of the issuing State. Secondly, |
under the one-order-at-a-time system, the validity and |
enforceability of the controlling order continues unabated |
until it is fully complied with, unless it is replaced by a |
modified order issued in accordance with the standards |
established by Sections 609-615. That is, even if the |
individual parties and the child no longer reside in the |
issuing State, the controlling order remains in effect and may |
be enforced by the issuing State or any responding State |
without regard to the fact that the potential |
for its modification and replacement exists. The 2001 |
amendments to Subsection (a) authorize the issuing tribunal to |
initiate a |