LD 1609
pg. 38
Page 37 of 148 An Act To Establish the Uniform Partnership Act Page 39 of 148
Download Bill Text
LR 1469
Item 1

 
presumptions that apply when the partners have failed to express
their intent.

 
First, under subsection (c), property purchased with
partnership funds is presumed to be partnership property,
notwithstanding the name in which title is held. The presumption
is intended to apply if partnership credit is used to obtain
financing, as well as the use of partnership cash or property for
payment. Unlike the rule in subsection (b), under which property
is deemed to be partnership property if the partnership's name or
the partner's capacity as a partner is disclosed in the
instrument of conveyance, subsection (c) raises only a
presumption that the property is partnership property if it is
purchased with partnership assets.

 
That presumption is also subject to an important caveat.
Under Section 302(b), partnership property held in the name of
individual partners, without an indication of their capacity as
partners or of the existence of a partnership, that is
transferred by the partners in whose name title is held to a
purchaser without knowledge that it is partnership property is
free of any claims of the partnership.

 
Second, under subsection (d), property acquired in the name of
one or more of the partners, without an indication of their
capacity as partners and without use of partnership funds or
credit, is presumed to be the partners' separate property, even
if used for partnership purposes. In effect, it is presumed in
that case that only the use of the property is contributed to the
partnership.

 
4. Generally, under RUPA, partners and third parties dealing
with partnerships will be able to rely on the record to determine
whether property is owned by the partnership. The exception is
property purchased with partnership funds without any reference
to the partnership in the title documents. The inference
concerning the partners' intent from the use of partnership funds
outweighs any inference from the State of the title, subject to
the overriding reliance interest in the case of a purchaser
without notice of the partnership's interest. This allocation of
risk should encourage the partnership to eliminate doubt about
ownership by putting title in the partnership.

 
5. UPA Section 8(4) provides, "A transfer to a partnership in
the partnership name, even without words of inheritance, passes
the entire estate or interest of the grantor unless a contrary
intent appears." It has been omitted from RUPA as unnecessary
because modern conveyancing law deems all transfers to pass the
entire estate or interest of the grantor unless a contrary intent
appears.


Page 37 of 148 Top of Page Page 39 of 148