LD 1609
pg. 37
Page 36 of 148 An Act To Establish the Uniform Partnership Act Page 38 of 148
Download Bill Text
LR 1469
Item 1

 
capacity as a partner or of the existence of a partnership and
without use of partnership assets, is presumed to be separate
property, even if used for partnership purposes.

 
Comment

 
(This is Section 204 of the Uniform Partnership Act (1997).)

 
1. Section 204 sets forth the rules for determining when
property is acquired by the partnership and, hence, becomes
partnership property. It is based on UPA Section 8(3), as
influenced by the recent Alabama and Georgia modifications. The
rules govern the acquisition of personal property, as well as
real property, that is held in the partnership name. See Section
101(9).

 
2. Subsection (a) governs the circumstances under which
property becomes "partnership property," and subsection (b)
clarifies the circumstances under which property is acquired "in
the name of the partnership." The concept of record title is
emphasized, although the term itself is not used. Titled
personal property, as well as all transferable interests in real
property acquired in the name of the partnership, are covered by
this section.

 
Property becomes partnership property if acquired (1) in the
name of the partnership or (2) in the name of one or more of the
partners with an indication in the instrument transferring title
of either (i) their capacity as partners or (ii) of the existence
of a partnership, even if the name of the partnership is not
indicated. Property acquired "in the name of the partnership"
includes property acquired in the name of one or more partners in
their capacity as partners, but only if the name of the
partnership is indicated in the instrument transferring title.

 
Property transferred to a partner is partnership property,
even though the name of the partnership is not indicated, if the
instrument transferring title indicates either (i) the partner's
capacity as a partner or (ii) the existence of a partnership.
This is consonant with the entity theory of partnership and
resolves the troublesome issue of a conveyance to fewer than all
the partners but which nevertheless indicates their partner
status.

 
3. Ultimately, it is the intention of the partners that
controls whether property belongs to the partnership or to one or
more of the partners in their individual capacities, at least as
among the partners themselves. RUPA sets forth two rebuttable


Page 36 of 148 Top of Page Page 38 of 148