LD 1609
pg. 12
Page 11 of 148 An Act To Establish the Uniform Partnership Act Page 13 of 148
Download Bill Text
LR 1469
Item 1

 
another jurisdiction), that is, a general partnership. Thus, as
used in RUPA, the term "partnership" does not encompass limited
partnerships, contrary to the use of the term in the UPA. Section
901(3) defines "limited partnership" for the purpose of Article 9,
which deals with conversions and mergers of general and limited
partnerships.

 
The definition of "partnership agreement" is adapted from
Section 101(9) of RULPA. The RUPA definition is intended to
include the agreement among the partners, including amendments,
concerning either the affairs of the partnership or the conduct
of its business. It does not include other agreements between
some or all of the partners, such as a lease or loan agreement.
The partnership agreement need not be written; it may be oral or
inferred from the conduct of the parties.

 
Any partnership in which the partners have not agreed to
remain partners until the expiration of a definite term or the
completion of a particular undertaking is a "partnership at
will." The distinction between an "at-will" partnership and a
partnership for "a definite term or the completion of a
particular undertaking" is important in determining the rights of
dissociating and continuing partners following the dissociation
of a partner. See Sections 601, 602, 701(b), 801(a), 802(b), and
803.

 
It is sometimes difficult to determine whether a partnership
is at will or is for a definite term or the completion of a
particular undertaking. Presumptively, every partnership is an
at-will partnership. See, e.g., Stone v. Stone, 292 So. 2d 686
(La. 1974); Frey v. Hauke, 171 Neb. 852, 108 N.W.2d 228 (1961).
To constitute a partnership for a term or a particular
undertaking, the partners must agree (i) that the partnership
will continue for a definite term or until a particular
undertaking is completed and (ii) that they will remain partners
until the expiration of the term or the completion of the
undertaking. Both are necessary for a term partnership; if the
partners have the unrestricted right, as distinguished from the
power, to withdraw from a partnership formed for a term or
particular undertaking, the partnership is one at will, rather
than a term partnership.

 
To find that the partnership is formed for a definite term or
a particular undertaking, there must be clear evidence of an
agreement among the partners that the partnership (i) has a
minimum or maximum duration or (ii) terminates at the conclusion
of a particular venture whose time is indefinite but certain to
occur. See, e.g., Stainton v. Tarantino, 637 F. Supp. 1051 (E.D.
Pa. 1986) (partnership to dissolve no later than December 30,


Page 11 of 148 Top of Page Page 13 of 148