limited partners." Thus limited partnership law expressly |
references general partnership law for general partner liability |
and does not separately consider the liability of such partners. |
The liability of a general partner of a limited partnership that |
becomes a LLLP would therefore be the liability of a general |
partner in an LLP and would be governed by Section 306. The |
liability of a limited partner in a LLLP is a more complicated |
matter. RULPA Section 303(a) separately considers the liability of |
a limited partner. Unless also a general partner, a limited |
partner is not liable for the obligations of a limited partnership |
unless the partner participates in the control of the business and |
then only to persons reasonably believing the limited partner is a |
general partner. Therefore, arguably limited partners in a LLLP |
will have the specific RULPA Section 303(c) liability shield while |
general partners will have a superior Section 306(c) liability |
shield. In order to clarify limited partner liability and other |
linkage issues, States that have adopted RUPA, these limited |
liability partnership rules, and RULPA may wish to consider an |
amendment to RULPA. A suggested form of such an amendment is: |