| Be it enacted by the People of the State of Maine as follows: |
|
| | Sec. A-1. 31 MRSA c. 9, as amended, is repealed. |
|
| | Sec. A-2. 31 MRSA c. 17 is enacted to read: |
|
| | The National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws | first considered a uniform law of partnership in 1902. Although | early drafts had proceeded along the mercantile or "entity" | theory of partnerships, later drafts were based on the common-law | "aggregate" theory. The resulting Uniform Partnership Act | ("UPA"), which embodied certain aspects of each theory, was | finally approved by the Conference in 1914. The UPA governs | general partnerships, and also governs limited partnerships | except where the limited partnership statute is inconsistent. | The UPA has been adopted in every State other than Louisiana and | has been the subject of remarkably few amendments in those States | over the past 80 years. |
|
| | In January of 1986, an American Bar Association subcommittee | issued a detailed report that recommended extensive revisions to | the UPA. See UPA Revision Subcommittee of the Committee on | Partnerships and Unincorporated Business Organizations, Section | of Business Law, American Bar Association, Should the Uniform | Partnership Act be Revised?, 43 Bus. Law. 121 (1987) ("ABA | Report"). The ABA Report recommended that the entity theory | "should be incorporated into any revision of the UPA whenever | possible." Id. at 124. |
|
| | In 1987, the Conference appointed a Drafting Committee to | Revise the Uniform Partnership Act and named a Reporter. The | Committee held its initial meeting in January of 1988 and a first | reading of the Committee's draft was begun at the Conference's | 1989 Annual Meeting in Kauai, Hawaii. The first reading was | completed at the 1990 Annual Meeting in Milwaukee. The second | reading was begun at Naples, Florida, in 1991 and completed at | San Francisco in 1992. The Revised Uniform Partnership Act | (1992) was adopted unanimously by a vote of the States on August | 6, 1992. The following year, in response to suggestions from | various groups, including an American Bar Association | subcommittee and several state bar associations, the Drafting | Committee recommended numerous revisions to the Act. Those were | adopted at the Charleston, South Carolina, Annual Meeting in | 1993, and the Act was restyled as the Uniform Partnership Act | (1993). Subsequently, a final round of changes was incorporated, | and the Conference unanimously adopted the Uniform Partnership |
|
|