LD 509
pg. 63
Page 62 of 183 An Act To Adopt the Maine Uniform Securities Act Page 64 of 183
Download Bill Text
LR 441
Item 1

 
conclude this exemption are new and are intended to address these
concerns.

 
13. Section 202(12): Bankruptcy, guardian, or conservator
transactions: Prior Provisions: 1956 Act Section 402(b)(6); RUSA
Section 402(8). This subsection is identical to that in the 1956
Act and RUSA.

 
14. Section 202(13): Transactions with specified investors:
Prior Provision: 1956 Act Section 402(b)(8). The 1956 Act
contains similar but less inclusive language in Section
402(b)(8). If the Securities and Exchange Commission adopts a
rule defining "qualified purchaser" as used in Section 18(b)(3)
of the Securities Act to specify certain purchasers of federal
covered securities, part or all of this exemption will be
redundant. As of September 2002, the Commission has proposed, but
not adopted, Rule 146(c).

 
Section 202(13)(B) is limited to transactions for the account
of a federal covered investment adviser and is not intended to
reach transactions on behalf of others by such adviser.

 
15. Section 202(14): Limited offering transactions: Prior
Provisions: 1956 Act Section 402(b)(9); RUSA Section 402(11). The
reference in the prefatory language to "a single issue" signifies
that two or more issues can be "integrated" and potentially
destroy the exemption. There are two general tests for
integration under the federal securities laws. The states
similarly have followed generally these types of integration
principles with respect to securities transaction exemptions.
First, there is a six month "buffer" before and after an offer,
offer to sell, or sale of a transaction exempt under Section
202(14) during which no other issue can be distributed if
integration automatically is to be avoided. See Rule 147(b)(2)
and Rule 502(a) of the Securities Act of 1933. Second, if two
issues occur within six months, integration may occur depending
upon the following factors:

 
(i) are the offerings part of a single plan of financing;

 
(ii) do the offerings involve issuance of the same class of
securities;

 
(iii) are the offerings made at or about the same time;

 
(iv) is the same type of consideration to be received; and

 
(v) are the offerings made for the same general purpose.

 
See generally 3 Louis Loss & Joel Seligman, Securities Regulation
1231-1248 (3d ed. rev. 1999).


Page 62 of 183 Top of Page Page 64 of 183