LD 509
pg. 4
Page 3 of 183 An Act To Adopt the Maine Uniform Securities Act Page 5 of 183
Download Bill Text
LR 441
Item 1

 
Section 102(6), federal covered investment adviser, and in Section
102(7), federal covered security. NSMIA also had implications for
several securities registration exemptions (see Sections 201(3),
201(4), 201(6), 202(4), 202(6), 202(13), 202(14), 202(15) and
202(16)); securities registration (Sections 301(1) and 302); and
the broker-dealer, agent, investment adviser, and investment
adviser representative provisions (see especially Sections
402(b)(1) and (5), 403(b)(1)(A) and (2), 405 and 411).

 
A third theme of the Act involves facilitating electronic
records, signatures, and filing. New definitions were added to
address filing (Section 102(8)), record (Section 102(25)), and
sign (Section 102(30)). Section 105 expressly permits the filing
of electronic signatures and records. Collectively these
provisions are intended to permit electronic filing in central
information depositories such as the Web-CRD (Central
Registration Depository), the Investment Adviser Registration
Depository (IARD), the Securities and Exchange Commission's
Electronic Data Gathering, Analysis and Retrieval System (EDGAR)
or successor institutions. Electronic communication also has led
to an amplification of the jurisdiction Section 610.

 
The new Act makes several other significant changes compared
to the 1956 Act or RUSA.

 
(1) The definition of "security" in Section 102(28) has been
modernized to take into account amendments to the counterpart
federal provisions; add new language to expressly include
uncertificated securities; exclude contributory or
noncontributory ERISA plans; and amplify the definition of
investment contract so that it can expressly reach interests in
limited partnerships, limited liability companies, or viatical
settlement agreements, among other contracts, when they satisfy
the definition of investment contract.

 
The new Act does not expressly exclude from the definition of
security variable insurance products, but does exempt variable
insurance products from securities registration in Section
201(4). The states are divided on the question of whether
variable insurance products should be excluded (and not subject
to fraud enforcement) or exempted (and subject to fraud
enforcement). For those states that wish to continue to provide
or adopt an exclusion for variable insurance products from the
definition of security, the brackets should be removed from the
phrase "or variable." For those states that wish variable
insurance products to be included in the definition of security,
the bracketed phrase should be removed.


Page 3 of 183 Top of Page Page 5 of 183