|
Section 102(6), federal covered investment adviser, and in Section | 102(7), federal covered security. NSMIA also had implications for | several securities registration exemptions (see Sections 201(3), | 201(4), 201(6), 202(4), 202(6), 202(13), 202(14), 202(15) and | 202(16)); securities registration (Sections 301(1) and 302); and | the broker-dealer, agent, investment adviser, and investment | adviser representative provisions (see especially Sections | 402(b)(1) and (5), 403(b)(1)(A) and (2), 405 and 411). |
|
| | A third theme of the Act involves facilitating electronic | records, signatures, and filing. New definitions were added to | address filing (Section 102(8)), record (Section 102(25)), and | sign (Section 102(30)). Section 105 expressly permits the filing | of electronic signatures and records. Collectively these | provisions are intended to permit electronic filing in central | information depositories such as the Web-CRD (Central | Registration Depository), the Investment Adviser Registration | Depository (IARD), the Securities and Exchange Commission's | Electronic Data Gathering, Analysis and Retrieval System (EDGAR) | or successor institutions. Electronic communication also has led | to an amplification of the jurisdiction Section 610. |
|
| | The new Act makes several other significant changes compared | to the 1956 Act or RUSA. |
|
| | (1) The definition of "security" in Section 102(28) has been | modernized to take into account amendments to the counterpart | federal provisions; add new language to expressly include | uncertificated securities; exclude contributory or | noncontributory ERISA plans; and amplify the definition of | investment contract so that it can expressly reach interests in | limited partnerships, limited liability companies, or viatical | settlement agreements, among other contracts, when they satisfy | the definition of investment contract. |
|
| | The new Act does not expressly exclude from the definition of | security variable insurance products, but does exempt variable | insurance products from securities registration in Section | 201(4). The states are divided on the question of whether | variable insurance products should be excluded (and not subject | to fraud enforcement) or exempted (and subject to fraud | enforcement). For those states that wish to continue to provide | or adopt an exclusion for variable insurance products from the | definition of security, the brackets should be removed from the | phrase "or variable." For those states that wish variable | insurance products to be included in the definition of security, | the bracketed phrase should be removed. |
|
|