The fairness of mediation is premised upon the informed |
consent of the parties to any agreement reached. See Wright v. |
Brockett, 150 Misc.2d 1031 (1991) (setting aside mediation |
agreement where conduct of landlord/tenant mediation made |
informed consent unlikely); see generally, Joseph B. Stulberg, |
Fairness and Mediation, 13 Ohio St. J. on Disp. Resol. 909, |
936-944 (1998); Craig A. McEwen, Nancy H. Rogers, Richard J. |
Maiman, Bring in the Lawyers: Challenging the Dominant |
Approaches to Ensuring Fairness in Divorce Mediation, 79 Minn. |
L. Rev. 1317 (1995). Some statutes permit the mediator to |
exclude lawyers from mediation, resting fairness guarantees on |
the lawyer's later review of the draft settlement agreement. |
See, e.g., Cal. Fam. Code Section 3182 (West 1993); McEwen, et |
al., 79 Minn. L. Rev., supra, at 1345-1346. At least one bar |
authority has expressed doubts about the ability of a lawyer |
to review an agreement effectively when that lawyer did not |
participate in the give and take of negotiation. Boston Bar |
Ass'n, Op. 78-1 (1979). Similarly, concern has been raised |
that the right to bring counsel might be a requirement of |
constitutional due process in mediation programs operated by |
courts or administrative agencies. Richard C. Reuben, |
Constitutional Gravity: A Unitary Theory of Alternative |
Dispute Resolution and Public Civil Justice, 47 UCLA L. Rev. |
949, 1095 (April 2000). |