LD 1295
pg. 62
Page 61 of 67 An Act To Enact the Uniform Mediation Act Page 63 of 67
Download Bill Text
LR 464
Item 1

 
language that may be helpful to states wishing to pursue the
issue.

 
If this Section is adopted, the state should also chose the
bracketed option with this Section in Section (d), so that a
mediator who is not impartial is precluded from asserting the
privilege. Section (e) makes this inapplicable to an
individual acting as a judge, whose impartiality is governed
by judicial cannons.

 
§10010.__Participation in mediation

 
An attorney or other individual designated by a party may
accompany the party to and participate in a mediation.__A
waiver of participation given before the mediation may be
rescinded.

 
REPORTER'S NOTES

 
The fairness of mediation is premised upon the informed
consent of the parties to any agreement reached. See Wright v.
Brockett, 150 Misc.2d 1031 (1991) (setting aside mediation
agreement where conduct of landlord/tenant mediation made
informed consent unlikely); see generally, Joseph B. Stulberg,
Fairness and Mediation, 13 Ohio St. J. on Disp. Resol. 909,
936-944 (1998); Craig A. McEwen, Nancy H. Rogers, Richard J.
Maiman, Bring in the Lawyers: Challenging the Dominant
Approaches to Ensuring Fairness in Divorce Mediation, 79 Minn.
L. Rev. 1317 (1995). Some statutes permit the mediator to
exclude lawyers from mediation, resting fairness guarantees on
the lawyer's later review of the draft settlement agreement.
See, e.g., Cal. Fam. Code Section 3182 (West 1993); McEwen, et
al., 79 Minn. L. Rev., supra, at 1345-1346. At least one bar
authority has expressed doubts about the ability of a lawyer
to review an agreement effectively when that lawyer did not
participate in the give and take of negotiation. Boston Bar
Ass'n, Op. 78-1 (1979). Similarly, concern has been raised
that the right to bring counsel might be a requirement of
constitutional due process in mediation programs operated by
courts or administrative agencies. Richard C. Reuben,
Constitutional Gravity: A Unitary Theory of Alternative
Dispute Resolution and Public Civil Justice, 47 UCLA L. Rev.
949, 1095 (April 2000).

 
Some parties may prefer not to bring counsel. However, because
of the capacity of attorneys to help mitigate power
imbalances, and in the absence of other procedural protections
for less powerful parties, the Drafting Committees elected to
let the
parties, not the mediator, decide. Also, their agreement to
exclude counsel


Page 61 of 67 Top of Page Page 63 of 67