LD 1295
pg. 27
Page 26 of 67 An Act To Enact the Uniform Mediation Act Page 28 of 67
Download Bill Text
LR 464
Item 1

 
Incarcerating Juveniles in Adult Jails, 66 Ind. L.J. 999, 1021
(1991). Exempting these programs serves the same policies as are
served by the peer mediation exclusion for non-incarcerated
youths. The Drafters do not intend to exclude cases where at
least one party is not a resident, such as a class action suit
against a non-resident in which the parties mediate or attempt
to mediate the case.

 
7. Section 3(c). Alternative of non-privileged mediation.

 
This Section allows the parties to opt for a non-privileged
mediation or mediation session by mutual agreement, and
furthers the Act's policy of party self-determination. If the
parties so agree, the privilege sections of the Act do not
apply, thus fulfilling the parties reasonable expectations
regarding the confidentiality of that mediation or session.
For example, parties in a sophisticated commercial mediation,
who are represented by counsel, may see no need for a
privilege to attach to a mediation or session, and may by
express written agreement "opt out" of the Act's privilege
provisions. Similarly, parties may also use this option if
they wish to rely on, and therefore use in evidence,
statements made during the mediation. It is the parties rather
than the mediator who make this choice, although a mediator
could presumably refuse to mediate a mediation or session that
is not covered by this Act. Even if the parties do not agree
in advance, the parties, mediator, and all nonparty
participants can waive the privilege pursuant to Section 5. In
this instance, however, the mediator and other participants
can block the waiver in some respects.

 
If the parties want to opt out, they should inform the
mediators or nonparty participants of this agreement, because
without actual notice, the privileges of the Act still apply
to the mediation communications of the persons who have not
been so informed until such notice is actually received. Thus,
for example, if a nonparty participant has not received notice
that the opt-out has been invoked, and speaks during a
mediation, that mediation communication is privileged under
the Act. If, however, one of the parties or the mediator tells
the nonparty participant that the opt-out has been invoked,
the privilege no longer attaches to statements made after the
actual notice has been provided, even though the earlier
statements remain privileged because of the lack of notice.

 
8. Other scope issues.

 
The Act would apply to all mediations that fit the definitions
of mediation by a mediator unless specifically excluded by the
State adopting the Act. For example, a State may want to
exclude international commercial conciliation, which is
covered by
specific statute in some States. See, e.g., N.C. Gen. Stat.


Page 26 of 67 Top of Page Page 28 of 67