|
judge with responsibility for the case. This is consistent with | the prohibition on mediator reports to courts in Section 7. The | term "judge" in Section 3(b)(3) includes magistrates, special | masters, referees, and any other persons responsible for making | rulings or recommendations on the case. However, the Act does | not apply to a court mediator, or a mediator who contracts or | volunteers to mediate cases for a court because they may not | make later rulings on the case. Similarly mediations conducted | by judges specifically and exclusively are assigned to mediate | cases, so-called "buddy judges," and retired judges who return | to mediate cases do not fall within the Section 3(b)(3) | exemption because such mediators do not make later rulings on | the case. |
|
| Local rules are usually not recognized beyond the court's | jurisdiction, and may not provide assurance of confidentiality | if the mediation communications are sought in another | jurisdiction, and if the jurisdiction does not permit | recognize privilege by local rule. |
|
| 5. Section 3(b)(4)(A). Exclusion of peer mediation. |
|
| The Act also exempts mediations between students conducted | under the auspices of school programs because the supervisory | needs of schools toward students, particularly in peer | mediation, may not be consistent with the confidentiality | provisions of the Act. For example, school administrators need | to be able to respond to, and in a proceeding verify, | legitimate threats to student safety or domestic violence that | may surface during a mediation between students. See | Memorandum from ABA Section of Dispute Resolution to Uniform | Mediation Act Reporters (Nov. 15, 1999) (on file with UMA | Drafting Committees). The law has "repeatedly emphasized the | need for affirming the comprehensive authority of the States | and of school officials, consistent with fundamental | constitutional safeguards, to prescribe and control conduct in | the schools." Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community | School District, 393 U.S. 503, 508 (1969), citing Epperson v. | Arkansas, 393 U.S. 97, 104 (1968) and Meyer v. Nebraska, 262 | U.S. 390, 402 (1923). |
|
| This exemption does not include mediations involving a | teacher, parent, or other non-student as such an exemption | might preclude coverage of truancy mediation and other | mediation sessions for which the privilege is pertinent |
|
| 6. Section 3(b)(4)(B). Exclusion of correctional institutions | for youth. |
|
| The Act also exempts programs involving youths at correctional | institutions if the mediation parties are all residents of the | institution. This is to facilitate and encourage mediation and | conflict prevention and resolution techniques among those | juveniles who have well-documented and profound needs in those | areas. Kristina H. Chung, Kids Behind Bars: The Legality of |
|
|