LD 1295
pg. 26
Page 25 of 67 An Act To Enact the Uniform Mediation Act Page 27 of 67
Download Bill Text
LR 464
Item 1

 
judge with responsibility for the case. This is consistent with
the prohibition on mediator reports to courts in Section 7. The
term "judge" in Section 3(b)(3) includes magistrates, special
masters, referees, and any other persons responsible for making
rulings or recommendations on the case. However, the Act does
not apply to a court mediator, or a mediator who contracts or
volunteers to mediate cases for a court because they may not
make later rulings on the case. Similarly mediations conducted
by judges specifically and exclusively are assigned to mediate
cases, so-called "buddy judges," and retired judges who return
to mediate cases do not fall within the Section 3(b)(3)
exemption because such mediators do not make later rulings on
the case.

 
Local rules are usually not recognized beyond the court's
jurisdiction, and may not provide assurance of confidentiality
if the mediation communications are sought in another
jurisdiction, and if the jurisdiction does not permit
recognize privilege by local rule.

 
5. Section 3(b)(4)(A). Exclusion of peer mediation.

 
The Act also exempts mediations between students conducted
under the auspices of school programs because the supervisory
needs of schools toward students, particularly in peer
mediation, may not be consistent with the confidentiality
provisions of the Act. For example, school administrators need
to be able to respond to, and in a proceeding verify,
legitimate threats to student safety or domestic violence that
may surface during a mediation between students. See
Memorandum from ABA Section of Dispute Resolution to Uniform
Mediation Act Reporters (Nov. 15, 1999) (on file with UMA
Drafting Committees). The law has "repeatedly emphasized the
need for affirming the comprehensive authority of the States
and of school officials, consistent with fundamental
constitutional safeguards, to prescribe and control conduct in
the schools." Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community
School District, 393 U.S. 503, 508 (1969), citing Epperson v.
Arkansas, 393 U.S. 97, 104 (1968) and Meyer v. Nebraska, 262
U.S. 390, 402 (1923).

 
This exemption does not include mediations involving a
teacher, parent, or other non-student as such an exemption
might preclude coverage of truancy mediation and other
mediation sessions for which the privilege is pertinent

 
6. Section 3(b)(4)(B). Exclusion of correctional institutions
for youth.

 
The Act also exempts programs involving youths at correctional
institutions if the mediation parties are all residents of the
institution. This is to facilitate and encourage mediation and
conflict prevention and resolution techniques among those
juveniles who have well-documented and profound needs in those
areas. Kristina H. Chung, Kids Behind Bars: The Legality of


Page 25 of 67 Top of Page Page 27 of 67