|
locations. See, e.g., Brower v. Gateway 2000, Inc., 246 A.D. | 246, 676 N.Y.S.2d 569 (1998) (holding unconscionable on ground | of cost a clause which both required computer purchasers to | arbitrate disputes in Chicago, Illinois, and also required | arbitration according to rules of the International Chamber of | Commerce which impose high administrative costs); Patterson v. | ITT Consumer Fin. Corp., 14 Cal. App. 4th 1659, 18 Cal. Rptr. 2d | 563 (1993) (refusing to enforce arbitration clause imposed by | financing corporation on State's consumers that required | arbitration to be heard in Minneapolis, Minnesota, and required | payment of substantial filing fees). |
|
| | 1.__Subject of appeal.__An appeal may be taken from: |
|
| A.__An order denying a motion to compel arbitration; |
|
| B.__An order granting a motion to stay arbitration; |
|
| C.__An order confirming or denying confirmation of an | award; |
|
| D.__An order modifying or correcting an award; |
|
| E.__An order vacating an award without directing a | rehearing; or |
|
| F.__A final judgment entered pursuant to this chapter. |
|
| | 2.__Manner of appeal.__An appeal under this section must be | taken as from an order or a judgment in a civil action. |
|
| §8729.__Uniformity of application and construction |
|
| | In applying and construing this uniform Act, consideration | must be given to the need to promote uniformity of the law | with respect to its subject matter among states that enact it. |
|
| §8730.__Relationship to Electronic Signatures in Global and |
|
| | The provisions of this chapter governing the legal effect, | validity and enforceability of electronic records or | electronic signatures and of contracts performed with the use | of such records or signatures, conform to the requirements of | Section 102 of the federal Electronic Signatures in Global and | National Commerce Act, 15 United States Code, Section 7001, et | seq. |
|
|