LD 1218
pg. 90
Page 89 of 94 An Act To Enact the Revised Uniform Arbitration Act Page 91 of 94
Download Bill Text
LR 468
Item 1

 
Ct. App. 1984) ("[E]very state that has considered the question
of jurisdiction to confirm the award has focused on the place of
arbitration and not the locus of the contract. * * * [T]he place
of contracting is not always, or even frequently, the convenient
location for arbitration. Modern business operates in a multi-
state environment, and the parties should be permitted to choose
the place of arbitration and confirmation upon consideration of
convenience, and not upon artificial concepts of the place of
contracting."); see also General Elec. Co. v. Star Technologies,
Inc., 1996 WL 377028 (Del. Ch., June 13, 1996); Stephanie's v.
Ultracashmere House LTD, 98 Ill.App. 3d 654, 424 N.E.2d 979, 54
Ill.Dec. 229 (1981); Tru Green Corp. v. Sampson, 802 S.W.2d 951
(Ky. App. 1991); Kearsarge Metallurgical Corp. v. Peerless Ins.
Co., 383 Mass. 162, 418 N.E.2d 580 (1981).

 
4. It should be noted that in accordance with Section
4(b)(1) parties can waive the requirements of Section 26 after
a dispute arises under an arbitration agreement.

 
§8727.__Venue

 
A motion pursuant to section 8705 must be made in the
Superior Court of the county in which the agreement to
arbitrate specifies the arbitration hearing is to be held or,
if the hearing has been held, in the Superior Court of the
county in which it was held.__Otherwise, the motion may be
made in the Superior Court of any county in which an adverse
party resides or has a place of business or, if no adverse
party has a residence or place of business in this State, in
the Superior Court of any county in this State.__All
subsequent motions must be made in the court hearing the
initial motion unless the court otherwise directs.

 
Uniform Comment

 
1. Oftentimes the parties in their arbitration agreement
determine the location of the arbitration hearing. If the
arbitration clause does not provide for a location, Section 15
allows the arbitrator to set the location of the hearing. The
venue provisions in this section give priority to the county
in which the arbitration hearing was held.

 
2. Choice-of-forum clauses and, as a result, venue
provisions have the potential to cause problems in adhesion
situations. It should be noted that courts, in determining the
enforceability of arbitration agreements under provisions such
as Section
6(a) have voided as unconscionable clauses in arbitration
agreements that require persons to arbitrate in distant


Page 89 of 94 Top of Page Page 91 of 94