|
Ct. App. 1984) ("[E]very state that has considered the question | of jurisdiction to confirm the award has focused on the place of | arbitration and not the locus of the contract. * * * [T]he place | of contracting is not always, or even frequently, the convenient | location for arbitration. Modern business operates in a multi- | state environment, and the parties should be permitted to choose | the place of arbitration and confirmation upon consideration of | convenience, and not upon artificial concepts of the place of | contracting."); see also General Elec. Co. v. Star Technologies, | Inc., 1996 WL 377028 (Del. Ch., June 13, 1996); Stephanie's v. | Ultracashmere House LTD, 98 Ill.App. 3d 654, 424 N.E.2d 979, 54 | Ill.Dec. 229 (1981); Tru Green Corp. v. Sampson, 802 S.W.2d 951 | (Ky. App. 1991); Kearsarge Metallurgical Corp. v. Peerless Ins. | Co., 383 Mass. 162, 418 N.E.2d 580 (1981). |
|
| | 4. It should be noted that in accordance with Section | 4(b)(1) parties can waive the requirements of Section 26 after | a dispute arises under an arbitration agreement. |
|
| | A motion pursuant to section 8705 must be made in the | Superior Court of the county in which the agreement to | arbitrate specifies the arbitration hearing is to be held or, | if the hearing has been held, in the Superior Court of the | county in which it was held.__Otherwise, the motion may be | made in the Superior Court of any county in which an adverse | party resides or has a place of business or, if no adverse | party has a residence or place of business in this State, in | the Superior Court of any county in this State.__All | subsequent motions must be made in the court hearing the | initial motion unless the court otherwise directs. |
|
| | 1. Oftentimes the parties in their arbitration agreement | determine the location of the arbitration hearing. If the | arbitration clause does not provide for a location, Section 15 | allows the arbitrator to set the location of the hearing. The | venue provisions in this section give priority to the county | in which the arbitration hearing was held. |
|
| | 2. Choice-of-forum clauses and, as a result, venue | provisions have the potential to cause problems in adhesion | situations. It should be noted that courts, in determining the | enforceability of arbitration agreements under provisions such | as Section | 6(a) have voided as unconscionable clauses in arbitration | agreements that require persons to arbitrate in distant |
|
|