|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
131st MAINE LEGISLATURE |
|
|
LD 1772 |
|
LR 2511(02) |
|
|
|
An Act to Require
Voter Approval of Certain Borrowing by Government-controlled Entities and
Utilities and to Provide Voters More Information Regarding That Borrowing |
|
Fiscal Note for
Bill as Engrossed with:
No Amendments |
|
Committee: State and Local Government |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Note |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Potential future referendum costs
Potential impact to affected entities if rejected by voters |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Detail
and Notes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
This citizen
initiative prohibits certain entities from borrowing money, incurring debt or
issuing bonds, notes or other evidences of indebtedness that cause their
individual debt outstanding at any one time to exceed $1,000,000,000 unless
such borrowing is approved by the voters at a general election. As is already
required under current law for general obligation bonds issued by the State,
the Treasurer of State is required to provide certain principal and interest
cost information to the Secretary of State to be printed on the ballot or
printed as a separate document and the Secretary of State must also include
it in the citizen's guide to the referendum. |
|
The large dollar
threshold, along with language that exempts certain major debt-issuing
entities from the requirement for voter approval, means that the number of
times such a borrowing will need to be voted on is expected to be quite
small. The Secretary of State's budget normally includes sufficient funds to
accommodate one ballot of average length for a general election in November.
If the number or size of the referendum questions requires production and
delivery of a second ballot, an additional appropriation of $266,000 may be
required for the Secretary of State. Whether this initiative will necessitate
a second ballot will depend on what else is on the ballot at each particular
general election when a borrowing appears. Any additional costs to the
Treasurer of State to prepare the required information is expected to be
insignificant. |
|
If a proposed future borrowing is approved by the voters,
there would be no additional fiscal impact from enactment of this initiative
apart from possible ballot costs. If a future borrowing is rejected by the
voters, there is the possibility of additional fiscal impact, but it would be
contingent on the nature of the specific borrowing rejected and no estimate
of fiscal impact can be made at this time on what might not occur because of
this initiative. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|