|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
129th MAINE LEGISLATURE |
|
|
LD 719 |
|
LR 2197(03) |
|
|
|
An Act To Amend
the Adult Use Marijuana Law |
|
Fiscal Note for
Bill as Amended by Committee Amendment " " |
|
Committee: Veterans and Legal Affairs |
|
Fiscal Note Required: Yes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Note |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2019-20 |
FY 2020-21 |
Projections FY 2021-22 |
Projections FY 2022-23 |
Net Cost
(Savings) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
General Fund |
|
$1,051,520 |
$3,800,600 |
$5,296,600 |
$7,408,600 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Appropriations/Allocations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
General Fund |
|
$83,520 |
$104,600 |
$104,600 |
$104,600 |
|
Other Special Revenue Funds |
|
$968,000 |
$3,696,000 |
$5,192,000 |
$7,304,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
|
|
|
|
General Fund |
|
($968,000) |
($3,696,000) |
($5,192,000) |
($7,304,000) |
|
Other Special Revenue Funds |
|
$968,000 |
$3,696,000 |
$5,192,000 |
$7,304,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Detail
and Notes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provisions in
this bill would transfer 25% of sales and excise tax receipts to the Local
Government Marijuana Revenue Fund (LGMRF).
The bill includes an Other Special Revenue Funds allocation of
$968,000 in fiscal year 2019-20 and $3,696,000 in fiscal year 2020-20 to
allow for the distribution of the amounts credited to the LGMRF. Transferring
sales and excise tax receipts to the LGMRF will reduce revenue to the General
Fund by the same amounts, $968,000 in fiscal year 2019-20 and $3,696,000 in
fiscal year 2020-21. |
|
The bill includes
ongoing General Fund appropriations to the Department of Administrative and
Financial Services of $78,520 in 2019-20 and $104,600 in fiscal year 2020-21
for one Senior Tax Examiner position to process transfers of sales and excise
tax receipts on adult use marijuana. Another $5,000 is appropriated in the
first year for one-time All Other costs to update sales reports and create an
excise tax report to facilitate distribution to municipalities. |
|
Other provisions
in this bill regarding ownership requirements may result in litigation which
could incur additional costs and delay implementation. Such a delay would
decrease anticipated revenue to the State and the distribution of funds. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|