|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
127th MAINE LEGISLATURE |
|
|
LD 86 |
|
LR 903(01) |
|
|
|
An Act To Improve
Retirement Security for Retired Public Employees |
|
Preliminary Fiscal
Impact Statement for Original Bill |
|
Sponsor: Rep. Sherman of Hodgdon |
|
Committee: Appropriations and Financial Affairs |
|
Fiscal Note Required: Yes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preliminary
Fiscal Impact Statement |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current biennium cost increase - General Fund
Potential future biennium cost increase - All Funds |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Detail
and Notes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current law
requires a cost-of-living adjustment (COLA) equal to the Consumer Price Index
(CPI) each fiscal year, up to a maximum of 3%, be applied to the first
$20,000, also indexed to the CPI, of pension benefits received by retired
state employees, teachers, judges and Legislators. This legislation sets a
minimum COLA of at least 2.55% for fiscal year 2014-15, fiscal year 2015-16
and fiscal year 2016-17 only. This 2.55% is the actuarial assumption used in
developing employer contribution rates for the 2014-2015 biennium and the
2016-2017 biennium. The actual COLA adjustment awarded in September of 2014
(fiscal year 2014-15) was 2.1%. |
|
Retroactively
increasing pensions from September 2014 by .45%, the difference between 2.1%
and 2.55%, will increase the unfunded liability of the Maine Public Employees
Retirement System (MainePERS). Pursuant to the Constitution of Maine, Article
IX, Section 18-A, unfunded liabilities may not be created except those that
result from experience losses. MainePERS will require a one-time General Fund
appropriation for the additional cost of this provision before the one-time
lump sum payment can be made. Upon direction of the committee prior to a
vote, or upon a favorable vote by the committee, MainePERS will engage the
services of its actuary in order to quantify the costs associated with this
bill. |
|
According to
MainePERS, providing a minimum COLA of 2.55% for benefits received by retired
state employees, teachers, judges and Legislators in fiscal year 2015-16 and
fiscal year 2016-17 will not result in an actuarially significant cost to the
plans due to the provision being provided on a one-time basis. If, however,
this provision were to be provided repeatedly in future years, it could
result in future costs, as the actuarial assumption for the COLA may need to
be increased. |
|
The provisions in
this bill may also result in higher costs to the State in future bienniums if
the CPI is lower than the actuarial assumption for the COLA in the 2016-2017
biennium due to potential actuarial gains that may have been realized being
unavailable to be factored into the development of future employer
contribution rates. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|