‘An Act To Establish a Competitive Bidding Process for the Operation of a Resort-style Casino in Southern Maine and a Casino To Benefit Federally Recognized Indian Tribes in the State’
HP0876 LD 1280 |
Session - 127th Maine Legislature S "B" to C "E", Filing Number S-442, Sponsored by Patrick
|
LR 1572 Item 20 |
|
Bill Tracking, Additional Documents | Chamber Status |
Amend the amendment by striking out the substitute title and replacing it with the following:
‘An Act To Establish a Competitive Bidding Process for the Operation of a Resort-style Casino in Southern Maine and a Casino To Benefit Federally Recognized Indian Tribes in the State’
Amend the amendment in section 7 in subsection 2-C in the 5th line (page 3, line 5 in amendment) by inserting after the following: " 1011-B" the following: ' or 1011-C'
Amend the amendment in section 9 in §1011-B in subsection 5 in paragraph B in the 4th line (page 7, line 4 in amendment) by striking out the following: " subsection 2-B" and inserting the following: ' subsection 2-C'
Amend the amendment by inserting after section 9 the following:
‘Sec. 10. 8 MRSA §1011-C is enacted to read:
§ 1011-C. Privilege to submit a casino operator license application for a northern casino pursuant to competitive bidding
The privilege to submit an application to the board for a casino operator license for a casino in Washington County or Aroostook County is governed by this section.
(1) The bidder's commitment and capacity to make an initial minimum capital investment of $20,000,000 for a casino facility. Land acquisition, license fees and off-site improvements are not considered to be part of the minimum capital investment;
(2) The potential gross and net income to be generated by the bidder based upon documented, expert market analysis;
(3) The extent to which the bidder's market plans suit the character of the region and the local population in a way that encourages residents of the State to choose to patronize the bidder's proposed facility as opposed to gaming facilities in other states or provinces;
(4) The extent to which the bidder's proposed gambling facility can reasonably be expected to serve as a regional recreational gambling destination;
(5) The bidder's proposed capital investment in a gambling facility, proposed amenities associated with the facility and timing of capital investment expenditures in terms of ensuring that the facility is profitable; and
(6) Other factors, properly disclosed in the commission's request for proposals, that the commission determines to be relevant;
(1) The bidder's plan to be part of or enter into a partnership with 2 or more federally recognized Indian tribes in the State and the extent to which the proposed gambling facility will maximize employment opportunities and economic benefits for all federally recognized Indian tribes in the State;
(2) The bidder's workforce development plan and the extent to which it will maximize use of the region's existing labor force;
(3) The impact on economic development, existing and planned, in the region of the proposed gambling facility; and
(4) Other factors, properly disclosed in the commission's request for proposals, that the commission determines to be relevant;
(1) The adequacy of transportation routes leading to the proposed location of the gambling facility;
(2) Any negative impact of the proposed location of the gambling facility on the municipality in which the facility is to be located, including but not limited to traffic congestion, worsened road safety conditions and increased safety concerns for pedestrian traffic;
(3) The proximity of the proposed location of the gambling facility to major transportation routes and the Canadian border in order to maximize patronage from cross-border traffic;
(4) The bidder's proposals for mitigating negative impacts identified under this paragraph; and
(5) Other factors, properly disclosed in the commission's request for proposals, that the commission determines to be relevant; and
(1) The bidder's plan to identify, address and minimize the potential for and existence of negative consequences associated with gambling and the operation of the bidder's proposed facility, including, but not limited to, a financial commitment to efforts to address problem gambling prevention, intervention, treatment and research;
(2) The effects, both positive and negative, that can be reasonably anticipated to be experienced by the municipality in which the proposed gambling facility is located and the communities in the region; and
(3) The likelihood that the bidder will meet the casino operator license requirements described in section 1016.
The commission shall consult with the Office of the Attorney General during the negotiation and execution of the contract. The contract must be approved by the Attorney General. The casino operator license issued by the board does not take effect and the board may not accept the license fee required under section 1018, subsection 1, paragraph C-3 until the contract is executed.
Amend the amendment by striking out all of section 12 and inserting the following:
‘Sec. 12. 8 MRSA §1018, sub-§1, ¶¶C-2 to C-5 are enacted to read:
Amend the amendment by striking out all of section 15 and inserting the following:
‘Sec. 15. 8 MRSA §1018, sub-§§2-A to 2-D, 3-A and 3-B are enacted to read:
Amend the amendment in section 16 in §1018-A in the first line (page 9, line 2 in amendment) by inserting after the following: " mitigation" the following: ' ; southern casino fee'
Amend the amendment in section 19 in subsection 3 in paragraph A in the last line (page 10, line 9 in amendment) by striking out the following: "and" and inserting the following: ' and'
Amend the amendment in section 19 in subsection 3 in paragraph B in the last line (page 10, line 13 in amendment) by striking out the following: "casino." and inserting the following: 'casino . ; and'
Amend the amendment in section 19 in subsection 3 by inserting at the end the following:
Amend the amendment by inserting after section 19 the following:
‘Sec. 20. 8 MRSA §1036, sub-§2-A, as amended by PL 2013, c. 118, §2, is further amended to read:
(1) The University of Maine System share is the total amount of the distribution multiplied by the ratio of enrolled students in the system to the total number of enrolled students both in the system and at the Maine Maritime Academy; and
(2) The Maine Maritime Academy share is the total amount of the distribution multiplied by the ratio of enrolled students at the academy to the total number of enrolled students both in the system and at the academy;
If a recipient of net slot machine income in paragraph D, H or I owns or receives funds from a slot machine facility or casino, other than the casino in Oxford County or the slot machine facility in Bangor, then the recipient may not receive funds under this subsection, and those funds must be retained by the Oxford County casino operator.’
Amend the amendment in section 20 in the first line (page 10, line 14 in amendment) by striking out the following: "and 2-E" and inserting the following: 'to 2-F'
Amend the amendment in section 20 by inserting at the end the following:
Amend the amendment by inserting after section 24 the following:
‘Sec. 25. Joint standing committee authorized to submit legislation. The joint standing committee of the Legislature having jurisdiction over veterans and legal affairs is authorized to submit legislation to the First Regular Session of the 128th Legislature establishing a manner of distribution of slot machine and table game revenue that will apply to a casino licensed pursuant to the Maine Revised Statutes, Title 8, section 1011-C in either Washington County or Aroostook County and amending the laws governing the issuance of casino operator licenses and the regulation of casinos based on rules of the Department of Public Safety, Gambling Control Board that currently govern those functions.’
Amend the amendment by relettering or renumbering any nonconsecutive Part letter or section number to read consecutively.
summary
This amendment establishes a competitive bid process for a casino in either Washington County or Aroostook County, the operation of which is to maximize economic and employment benefits for the 4 federally recognized Indian tribes in the State, known as the northern casino. The Casino Development Commission is directed to develop a request for proposals for the privilege to submit an application to the Department of Public Safety, Gambling Control Board for a casino operator license. Prior to the commission's submitting a request for proposals for a northern casino operator license, voters would have to approve the operation of a casino by a countywide referendum. The referendum must be held on the same date as a statewide election and no sooner than June 1, 2017 and no later than July 1, 2018. The fee to submit a bid to the commission is $100,000 for a northern casino. It provides for specific supporting information to be submitted by the bidder and considered by the commission including the bidder's ability to make a minimum capital investment of $20,000,000 for a northern casino. The bid for a northern casino requires a partnership with at least 2 federally recognized Indian tribes in the State.
For the northern casino, the commission is directed to develop a point system for the factors to be considered in evaluating proposals and give priority to proposals that maximize the employment and economic benefits to federally recognized Indian tribes in the State. The winning bidder must enter into a contract with the commission that obligates the casino operator to abide by the proposals made in the winning bid. Failure to abide by the terms of the contract could result in financial penalties to the operator.
The license fee for a northern casino under the amendment is $1,000,000 for a 5-year term with a renewal fee of $100,000.
The amendment sets the distribution of net slot machine revenue for the northern casino at 46% and sets the distribution of net table game revenue for the casino at 16%. The bill authorizes the Joint Standing Committee on Veterans and Legal Affairs to submit legislation establishing a distribution of the slot machine and table game revenue required to be paid by the casino.
Under current law, 4% of net slot machine income must be forwarded to the tribal governments of the Penobscot Nation and the Passamaquoddy Tribe, unless those tribal governments own or receive funds from a slot machine facility or casino, other than the casino located in Oxford County or the slot machine facility in Bangor, in which case the tribal governments are not due any of the net slot machine income. This amendment removes that disqualification, allowing those tribal governments to receive net slot machine income even if they own or receive funds from a slot machine facility or casino.