An Act To Amend the Process of Resolving Property Tax Abatement Disputes
Sec. 1. 36 MRSA §841, sub-§1, as repealed and replaced by PL 1993, c. 133, §1, is amended to read:
The municipal officers, either upon written application filed after one year but within 3 years from commitment stating the grounds for an abatement or on their own initiative within that time period, may make such reasonable abatement as they consider proper to correct any illegality, error or irregularity in assessment, provided as long as the taxpayer has complied with section 706. The Except as provided in section 842-A, the municipal officers may not grant an abatement to correct an error in the valuation of property.
Sec. 2. 36 MRSA §842, as amended by PL 2001, c. 396, §16, is further amended to read:
§ 842. Notice of decision
The assessors or municipal officers shall give to any person applying to them for an abatement of taxes notice in writing of their decision upon the application within 10 days after they take final action thereon. The notice of decision must state the specific reasons for a denial of the abatement and that the applicant has 60 days from the date the notice is received to appeal the decision or, if the request for an abatement is based on an error in the valuation of the property, to obtain 2 appraisals as described in section 842-A. It must also identify the board or agency designated by law to hear the appeal. If the assessors or municipal officers, before whom an application in writing for the abatement of a tax is pending, fail to give written notice of their decision within 60 days from the date of filing of the application, the application is deemed to have been denied, and the applicant may appeal as provided in sections 843 and 844, unless the applicant has in writing consented to further delay. Denial in this manner is final action for the purposes of notification under this section but failure to send notice of decision does not affect the applicant's right of appeal. This section does not apply to applications for abatement made under section 841, subsection 2.
Sec. 3. 36 MRSA §842-A is enacted to read:
§ 842-A. Use of appraisals to prove value
A person whose application for abatement has been denied pursuant to section 842, when the abatement was sought because of an error in the valuation of the property, may, instead of directly appealing the denial, provide alternative proof of valuation as described in this section.
Nothing in this section precludes a person from appealing the original denial of the application for abatement under section 842 without following the procedures described in this section.
Sec. 4. 36 MRSA §843, sub-§1, as amended by PL 1995, c. 262, §4, is further amended to read:
Sec. 5. 36 MRSA §843, sub-§2, as amended by PL 2001, c. 396, §17, is further amended to read:
summary
This bill amends the real property tax abatement process by:
1. Requiring the notice of decision of a denial of an application for abatement to contain the specific reasons for the denial; and
2. Allowing a person whose abatement based on the valuation of property is denied to obtain, prior to appealing the denial, 2 appraisals of the property for which the abatement is requested and submit these as proof of value to the assessors or municipal officers who denied the abatement application. The assessors or municipal officers may either accept the average of the appraisals as proof of value and allow the abatement or deny the abatement and file an appeal with the Superior Court or board of assessment review; the scope of the appeal is limited to the validity of the appraisals.