An Act To Protect Maine Citizens and Franchised New Motor Vehicle Dealers
Emergency preamble. Whereas, acts and resolves of the Legislature do not become effective until 90 days after adjournment unless enacted as emergencies; and
Whereas, Maine has regulated the terms of franchise agreements between franchised new motor vehicle dealers and their manufacturers for decades; and
Whereas, the manufacture, distribution and sale of motor vehicles in this State and the ability of franchised new motor vehicle dealers to provide for the distribution, sale and repair of vehicles vitally affect the general economy of the State, the transportation system and the public interest and public welfare; and
Whereas, recent economic circumstances have created a crisis in the automobile industry, most particularly among domestic automobile manufacturers; and
Whereas, manufacturers themselves have contributed to this crisis through suspect decision making in recent years in the operation of their businesses; and
Whereas, the solvency and economic vitality of Maine dealerships are jeopardized by both current economic conditions and the decision making of manufacturers; and
Whereas, Maine new motor vehicle dealerships provide thousands of high-paying jobs in Maine; and
Whereas, revenues crucial to the operation of state and local government, including property, excise and income taxes and in excess of 20% of all sales taxes, are collected as a result of the sale of motor vehicles; and
Whereas, in the judgment of the Legislature, these facts create an emergency within the meaning of the Constitution of Maine and require the following legislation as immediately necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health and safety; now, therefore,
Sec. 1. 10 MRSA §1171, sub-§9-B is enacted to read:
Sec. 2. 10 MRSA §1174, sub-§3, ¶P, as amended by PL 1997, c. 521, §16, is further amended to read:
(1) There is a failure by the new motor vehicle dealer to comply with a provision of the franchise, which provision is both reasonable and of material significance to the franchise relationship, as long as compliance on the part of the new motor vehicle dealer is reasonably possible and the manufacturer first acquired actual or constructive knowledge of the failure not more than 180 days prior to the date on which notification is given pursuant to paragraph R.
When the failure by the new motor vehicle dealer relates to the performance of the new motor vehicle dealer in sales or service, the failure of the new motor vehicle dealer to effectively carry out the performance provisions of the franchise is good cause if:
(a) The new motor vehicle dealer was apprised by the manufacturer in writing of that failure; the notification stated that notice was provided of failure of performance pursuant to this section; and the new motor vehicle dealer was afforded a reasonable opportunity for a period of not less than 6 months to exert good faith efforts to carry out the performance provisions;
(b) The failure thereafter continued within the period that began not more than 180 days before the date notification of termination, cancellation or nonrenewal was given pursuant to paragraph R; and
(c) The new motor vehicle dealer has not substantially complied with reasonable performance criteria established by the manufacturer and communicated to the dealer; or
(3) The dealer and the manufacturer or distributor agree not to renew the franchise , although the dealer is entitled to the protections set forth in paragraph S in any termination, whether by the manufacturer, the dealer or the parties in unison; or
(4) The manufacturer discontinues production or distribution of the franchise product;
Sec. 3. 10 MRSA §1174, sub-§3, ¶S, as amended by PL 1997, c. 521, §18, is further amended to read:
(1) All unsold new model motor vehicle inventory of the current and previous model year purchased from the manufacturer;
(2) Supplies and parts purchased from the manufacturer or its approved sources;
(3) Equipment and furnishings purchased from the manufacturer or its approved sources; and
(4) Special tools purchased from the manufacturer or its approved sources.
If the involuntary termination, cancellation or nonrenewal is due to a failure of performance of the new motor vehicle dealer in sales or service and the new motor vehicle dealer is leasing the dealership facilities from a lessor other than the manufacturer, the manufacturer shall pay the new motor vehicle dealer a sum equivalent to the rent for the unexpired term of the lease or one year's rent, whichever is less greater, or, if the new motor vehicle dealer owns the facilities, the manufacturer shall pay the new motor vehicle dealer a sum equivalent to the reasonable rental value of the facilities for one year, prorated for each line make at the facility based on total sales volume of each line make at the facility for the calendar year prior to the involuntary termination, cancellation or nonrenewal. The manufacturer shall pay the new motor vehicle dealer the sum equivalent to the rent or the reasonable rental value of the facilities when possible within 90 days of the effective date of the termination, cancellation or nonrenewal if the new motor vehicle dealer has notified the manufacturer of the amount of rent or reasonable rental value to which the dealer is entitled.
The fair and reasonable compensation for the items listed in subparagraphs (1) to (4) may in no instance be less than the acquisition price and must be paid by the manufacturer when possible within 90 days of the effective date of the termination, cancellation or nonrenewal, provided that the new motor vehicle dealer has clear title to the inventory and other items and is in a position to convey that title to the manufacturer.
In lieu of any injunctive relief or any other damages, if the manufacturer fails to prove there was good cause for the termination, cancellation or nonrenewal, or if the manufacturer fails to prove that it acted in good faith, then the manufacturer may pay the new motor vehicle dealer fair and reasonable compensation for the value of the dealership as an ongoing business; or
Sec. 4. 10 MRSA §1174, sub-§3, ¶T, as enacted by PL 1997, c. 521, §19, is amended to read:
Sec. 5. 10 MRSA §1174, sub-§3, ¶U is enacted to read:
In addition to any other payments or requirements in this chapter, if a termination, cancellation or nonrenewal was premised in whole or in part upon any of the occurrences set forth in this paragraph, the manufacturer is liable to the licensed new motor vehicle dealer in an amount at least equivalent to the fair market value of the franchise or the pecuniary loss to the dealer arising from the termination, cancellation or nonrenewal of the franchise, whichever is greater.
(1) If liability is based on the fair market value of the franchise, which must include diminution in value of the facilities leased or owned by the dealer as a result of the loss of the franchise to operate in the facilities, the fair market value must be computed on the date in divisions (a) to (c) that yields the highest fair market value:
(a) The date the manufacturer announces the action that results in termination, cancellation or nonrenewal;
(b) The date the action that results in termination, cancellation or nonrenewal first becomes general knowledge; or
(c) The date 12 months prior to the date on which the notice of termination, cancellation or nonrenewal is issued.
(2) As an alternative to the methodology set forth in subparagraph (1), a licensed new motor vehicle dealer may choose to accept the pecuniary loss arising out of a termination, cancellation or nonrenewal under this paragraph. This pecuniary loss must be established based upon the dealer's reasonable expectation of gain for a period of time not to exceed 7 years from the date of notice of termination, cancellation or nonrenewal. Pecuniary loss includes diminution in the value of the facilities leased or owned by the dealer as a result of the loss of the franchise to operate in the facilities.
If the termination, cancellation or nonrenewal is due to the manufacturer's change in distributors, the manufacturer may avoid paying fair market value or pecuniary loss to the licensed new motor vehicle dealer if the new distributor or the manufacturer offers the dealer a franchise agreement with terms acceptable to the dealer.
If an entity other than the original manufacturer of a line make becomes the manufacturer for the line make and intends to distribute motor vehicles of that line make in this State, that entity shall honor the franchise agreements of the original manufacturer and its licensed new motor vehicle dealers or offer those dealers a new franchise agreement for the line make on substantially similar terms and conditions; and
Emergency clause. In view of the emergency cited in the preamble, this legislation takes effect when approved.
summary
This bill provides protections to franchised new motor vehicle dealers against losses caused by unreasonable terminations by manufacturers.