An Act To Improve Water Quality through the Phaseout of Overboard Discharges and the Improvement of the Boat Pump-out Laws
Sec. 1. 38 MRSA §411-A, sub-§1, as enacted by PL 1989, c. 442, §1 and affected by c. 890, Pt. A, §40 and amended by Pt. B, §25, is repealed and the following enacted in its place:
Sec. 2. 38 MRSA §411-A, sub-§2-A, as enacted by PL 2003, c. 246, §4, is amended to read:
For purposes of this subsection, "annual income" means the sum of all the property owner's federal taxable gross income for the previous year for single family dwellings, individual taxpayers or gross profits for the previous year for commercial establishments and gross rents for the previous year for rental properties, as listed on the relevant federal income tax returns. A rental property must be considered a commercial establishment or as contributing to annual income depending upon how it is reported on the overboard discharge owner's taxes. "Annual income" for trusts also includes all individual beneficiaries' federal gross incomes or the grantor's gross income.
Sec. 3. 38 MRSA §413, sub-§3, as amended by PL 2007, c. 292, §18, is further amended to read:
Except when it has been demonstrated within 5 years prior to a transfer , or some other time period acceptable to the department, that there is no technologically proven alternative to an overboard discharge, prior to transfer of ownership of property containing an overboard discharge, the parties to the transfer shall determine the feasibility of technologically proven alternatives to the overboard discharge that are consistent with the plumbing standards adopted by the Department of Health and Human Services pursuant to Title 22, section 42 based on documentation from a licensed site evaluator provided by the applicant and approved by the Department of Environmental Protection. The licensed site evaluator shall demonstrate experience in designing replacement systems for overboard discharge. If an alternative to the overboard discharge is identified, the alternative system must be installed within 90 days of property transfer, except that, if soil conditions are poor due to seasonal weather, the alternative may be installed as soon as soil conditions permit. The installation of an alternative to the overboard discharge may be eligible for funding under section 411-A.
This subsection applies to licenses issued before September 1, 2010.
Sec. 4. 38 MRSA §413, sub-§3-A is enacted to read:
(1) Except when it has been demonstrated within 5 years prior to a transfer, or some other time period acceptable to the department, that there is no technologically proven alternative to an overboard discharge, prior to transfer of ownership of property containing an overboard discharge, the parties to the transfer shall determine the feasibility of technologically proven alternatives to the overboard discharge that are consistent with the plumbing standards adopted by the Department of Health and Human Services pursuant to Title 22, section 42.
(2) Except when it has been demonstrated within 5 years prior to the significant action, or some other time period acceptable to the department, that there is no technologically proven alternative to an overboard discharge, prior to the significant action the owner of the overboard discharge shall determine the feasibility of a technologically proven alternative to the overboard discharge that is consistent with the plumbing standards adopted by the Department of Health and Human Services pursuant to Title 22, section 42.
(3) The determination concerning whether there is a technologically proven alternative to an overboard discharge must be based on documentation from a licensed site evaluator provided by the applicant and approved by the Department of Environmental Protection that the system constitutes a best practicable treatment under section 414-A, subsection 1-B. If an alternative to the overboard discharge is identified, the alternative system must be installed within 90 days of property transfer or significant action, except that, if soil conditions are poor due to seasonal weather, the alternative may be installed as soon as soil conditions permit. The installation of an alternative to the overboard discharge may be eligible for funding under section 411-A.
Sec. 5. 38 MRSA §414-A, sub-§1-B, as amended by PL 2003, c. 246, §§10 to 13 and c. 689, Pt. B, §6, is further amended to read:
(1) The department's finding must be based on documentation from a licensed site evaluator provided by the overboard discharge owner and approved by the department. The licensed site evaluator shall demonstrate experience in designing replacement systems for overboard discharges.
(2) If a technologically proven alternative system is identified and is eligible for grant funding according to the cost-share schedule under section 411-A and grant funding is available, the alternative system must be installed within 180 days of written notification from the department, unless soil conditions are poor due to seasonal weather, in which case the alternative may be installed as soon as soil conditions permit.
(3) If a technologically proven alternative system eligible for grant funding according to the cost-share schedule is identified and funding is not available, then the owner of the overboard discharge is not required to install the system until grant funds are available or as provided in section 413, subsection 3. The department may determine that grant funds are not available when there are insufficient funds available for all alternative systems and the alternative system is not one of the systems identified as a priority for funding from available grant funds by the department.
(1) Seasonal residential overboard discharges that are located on the mainland or on any island connected to the mainland by vehicle bridge or by scheduled car ferry service, when the elimination of the discharge alone or in conjunction with the elimination of other discharges will result in the opening of a shellfish harvesting area or the removal of a public nuisance condition;
(2) All overboard discharges located within the boundaries of a sanitary or sewer district when the district has agreed to service and maintain the holding tank at an annual fee that does not exceed those fees charged to other similar users of the district's services who are physically connected to the sewers of the district; and
(3) All overboard discharges located within the municipality when the municipality has agreed to service and maintain the holding tank at an annual fee that does not exceed those fees charged to other similar users of the municipality's services who are physically connected to the sewers of the municipality.
Sec. 6. 38 MRSA §423-B, sub-§2, as enacted by PL 1999, c. 655, Pt. B, §1, is amended to read:
Sec. 7. 38 MRSA §465-B, sub-§1, ¶C, as amended by PL 2007, c. 291, §6, is further amended to read:
(1) Storm water discharges that are in compliance with state and local requirements; and
(2) Discharges of aquatic pesticides approved by the department for the control of mosquito-borne diseases in the interest of public health and safety using materials and methods that provide for protection of nontarget species. When the department issues a license for the discharge of aquatic pesticides authorized under this subparagraph, the department shall notify the municipality in which the application is licensed to occur and post the notice on the department's publicly accessible website . ; and
(3) An overboard discharge licensed prior to January 1, 1986 if no practicable alternative exists.
summary
The bill does the following.
It provides that, subject to the availability of funds, the Commissioner of Environmental Protection pays a portion of the cost of the alternative to an overboard discharge system in the form of a grant if certain criteria are met. Where the grant is insufficient to cover the cost of removal, the commissioner may offer a loan using funds from the revolving loan fund.
It sets an upper limit on income eligibility for funding to assist the owner of an overboard discharge and makes several changes and clarifications to the meaning of "annual income."
It clarifies the ownership transfer provisions and requires an alternatives analysis and possible replacement of an overboard discharge prior to significant reconstruction of the primary residence, expansion of the primary residence by 30%, division of the lot or transfer of the adjacent lot where the same person has a financial interest in the lot with the primary residence and the adjacent lot. Also, an alternative system to an overboard discharge must be removed where connection to a public sewer is practicable.
It changes references to "relicensing" overboard discharges to "licensing" and requires that an identified technologically proven replacement system be installed within 180 days of site evaluation approval and written notification by the Department of Environmental Protection. It also provides that the overboard discharge owner may apply for funding and provides for the postponement of replacement system installation should grant funding not be available.
The bill requires that watercraft sanitary waste pump-out facilities at marinas be easily accessible and functional during normal working hours and at all stages of the tide. The bill also sets an upper limit on the pump-out fee equivalent to 200% of the fee limit set pursuant to the Clean Vessel Act of 1992.
The bill also allows the licensing of existing overboard discharges that have no practicable alternatives.