An Act To Streamline the Process for Court-ordered Mental Health Examinations in Criminal Cases
Sec. 1. 15 MRSA §101-B, as amended by PL 2001, c. 634, §1 and PL 2003, c. 689, Pt. B, §§6 and 7, is repealed.
Sec. 2. 15 MRSA §101-C, sub-§1, as enacted by PL 1987, c. 402, Pt. A, §109, is amended to read:
Sec. 3. 15 MRSA §101-D is enacted to read:
§ 101-D. Mental examination of persons accused of crime
The court may order an examination under this paragraph over the objection of the defendant, but any report filed by the State Forensic Service must be impounded and may not be shared with the attorney for the State, unless with reference to criminal responsibility the defendant enters a plea of not criminally responsible by reason of insanity or with reference to an abnormal condition of mind the defendant provides notice to the attorney for the State of the intention to introduce testimony as to the defendant's abnormal condition of mind pursuant to the Maine Rules of Criminal Procedure, Rule 16A(a).
The court may order an examination under this paragraph over the objection of the defendant, but any report filed by the State Forensic Service must be impounded and may not be shared with the attorney for the State, unless with reference to criminal responsibility the defendant enters a plea of not criminally responsible by reason of insanity or with reference to an abnormal condition of mind the defendant provides notice to the attorney for the State of the intention to introduce testimony as to the defendant’s abnormal condition of mind pursuant to the Maine Rules of Criminal Procedure, Rule 16A(a).
Sec. 4. 15 MRSA §103, as amended by PL 2005, c. 263, §1, is further amended to read:
§ 103. Commitment following acceptance of negotiated insanity plea or following verdict or finding of insanity
When a court accepts a negotiated plea of not criminally responsible by reason of insanity or when a defendant is found not criminally responsible by reason of insanity by jury verdict or court finding, the judgment must so state. In those cases the court shall order the person committed to the custody of the Commissioner of Health and Human Services to be placed in an appropriate institution for the mentally ill or the mentally retarded care and treatment of persons with mental illness or mental retardation for care and treatment. Upon placement in the appropriate institution and in the event of transfer from one institution to another of persons committed under this section, notice of the placement or transfer must be given by the commissioner to the committing court.
When a person who has been evaluated on behalf of a court by the State Forensic Service is committed into the custody of the Commissioner of Health and Human Services pursuant to this section, the court shall order that the State Forensic Service share any information it has collected or generated with respect to the person with the institution in which the person is placed.
As used in this section, "not criminally responsible by reason of insanity" has the same meaning as in Title 17-A, section 39 and includes any comparable plea, finding or verdict in this State under former section 102; under a former version of Title 17-A, section 39; under former Title 17-A, section 58; or under former section 17-B, chapter 149 of the Revised Statutes of 1954.
Sec. 5. 15 MRSA §2211-A, sub-§8, as enacted by PL 1995, c. 431, §1, is amended to read:
Sec. 6. 15 MRSA §3318, sub-§1, ¶B, as amended by PL 2001, c. 471, Pt. F, §3, is further amended to read:
Sec. 7. 15 MRSA §3318, sub-§2, ¶B, as amended by PL 2001, c. 471, Pt. F, §3, is further amended to read:
Sec. 8. 17-A MRSA §1175, first ¶, as amended by PL 2005, c. 527, §14, is further amended to read:
Upon complying with subsection 1, a victim of a crime of murder or stalking or of a Class A, Class B or Class C crime for which the defendant is committed to the Department of Corrections or to a county jail or is committed to the custody of the Commissioner of Health and Human Services either under Title 15, section 103 after having been found not criminally responsible by reason of insanity or under Title 15, section 101-B 101-D after having been found incompetent to stand trial must receive notice of the defendant's unconditional release and discharge from institutional confinement upon the expiration of the sentence or upon release from commitment under Title 15, section 101-B 101-D or upon discharge under Title 15, section 104-A and must receive notice of any conditional release of the defendant from institutional confinement, including probation, supervised release for sex offenders, parole, furlough, work release, intensive supervision, supervised community confinement, home release monitoring or similar program, administrative release or release under Title 15, section 104-A.
Sec. 9. 17-A MRSA §1175, sub-§3, ¶B, as amended by PL 2005, c. 527, §15, is further amended to read:
Sec. 10. 17-A MRSA §1175, sub-§4, ¶A, as amended by PL 2005, c. 527, §16, is further amended to read:
Sec. 11. 34-B MRSA §1212, sub-§2, ¶A, as amended by PL 1989, c. 621, §9, is further amended to read:
summary
This bill is proposed by the Criminal Law Advisory Commission. The bill reorganizes the Maine Revised Statutes, Title 15 provisions that govern court-ordered mental health examinations of criminal defendants by linking the court's authority to order an examination to the specific issues to be addressed by the examination. The bill creates different provisions governing examinations to review competency to proceed, criminal responsibility and abnormal condition of the mind and mental condition relevant to other issues. By doing so, the bill will conserve resources by eliminating existing language that often resulted in the State Forensic Service's being ordered to address all of these issues when a narrower review would have satisfied the needs of the court and the parties.
The bill also eliminates existing language that requires examination by both a psychologist and a psychiatrist in insanity cases, often resulting in the expensive and unnecessary duplication of effort. Instead, the bill gives the court discretion to determine, in conjunction with the State Forensic Service, the number and type of examinations required under the circumstances of a particular case.
The bill provides a more flexible mechanism for the court to order a defendant committed for observation in an appropriate institution for the care and treatment of people with mental illness or mental retardation for the purpose of conducting the examination. Under existing law, such commitment may only occur after the State Forensic Service has conducted an initial examination and recommended commitment in its report to the court. The existing procedure often results in unnecessary expense and delay. Instead, the bill authorizes the court to order commitment when advised by the State Forensic Service that such commitment would materially enhance its ability to conduct the examination. The State Forensic Service may make this determination based upon consultation with the parties and the court and upon such other information it determines appropriate.
Finally, the bill ensures that when a person who has been evaluated by the State Forensic Service on behalf of a court is committed into the custody of the Commissioner of Health and Human Services, the court shall order the State Forensic Service to share any information it has gathered with respect to that person with the institution in which the person is placed.