An Act To Prohibit the Reduction of Benefits under the Maine Workers' Compensation Act of 1992 for Certain Prior Injuries
Sec. 1. 39-A MRSA §354, sub-§3, as amended by PL 1999, c. 354, §9, is further amended to read:
Sec. 2. 39-A MRSA §354, sub-§5 is enacted to read:
summary
This bill is in response to the Maine Supreme Judicial Court's decision in Legassie v. Securitas, Inc., 2008 ME 43, 944 A.2d 495. The decision in that case authorized a reduction to an injured worker's wage replacement and medical benefits because of a previously settled workers' compensation claim. This bill specifies that reducing an injured worker's benefits because of a prior settled injury is direct apportionment against the employee and is prohibited.
This bill also clarifies the applicability of the Maine Supreme Judicial Court's decision in Cust v. University of Maine, 2001 ME 29, 766 A.2d 566. This bill specifies that when an injured worker's permanent impairment rating under the Maine Revised Statutes, Title 39-A, section 213, subsection 1-A is above the applicable threshold on account of a single injury or the sum of multiple injuries, all of the worker's weekly benefits under the Maine Workers' Compensation Act of 1992 are exempt from the durational limit of Title 39-A, section 213, subsection 1.