‘1. In Section 1, subsection 34, the definition of "One Campus" is amended by striking out the reference to a physical or virtual presence and specifying that the term "One Campus" refers to a campus that contains the elements of an integrated, consolidated 9-16 educational facility promoting the development of a design where all facilities are located on one site and provide a streamlined and integrated learning experience for students of all ages.
2. Section 15, subsection 1 is amended to clearly specify that:
3. Section 15, subsection 2, paragraph C, subparagraph 4 is amended by removing the following: "Where will these courses be offered? On same campus? Virtually? At another site?"
4. Section 15, subsection 2, paragraph C, subparagraph 4 is also amended to remove language that indicates ratings must be based, in part, on a listing of courses and programs to be offered by a higher education unit and instead include language that indicates that ratings must be based, in part, on a list of strategies and approaches to be used to ensure that the higher education courses and programs are offered in facilities located on one site, providing a streamlined and integrated learning experience for students of all ages.
The State Board of Education is not required to hold further hearings or conduct other formal proceedings prior to final adoption of the rule as amended in accordance with this resolve; and be it further
Sec. 2. Emergency rule invalid. Resolved: That the emergency rule adopted by the State Board of Education on September 15, 2008 for the purpose of expediently selecting a qualified applicant to implement the innovative model does not reflect the intent of Resolve 2007, chapter 223 and does not have legal effect.’