An Act To Improve the Legislative Ethics Laws
Sec. 1. 1 MRSA §1003, sub-§2, as enacted by PL 1975, c. 621, §1, is amended to read:
Sec. 2. 1 MRSA §1005, as amended by PL 2001, c. 430, §3, is further amended to read:
§ 1005. Open meetings
Notwithstanding chapter 13, all meetings, hearings or sessions of the commission are open to the general public except as provided in section 1013, subsection 4 and unless, by an affirmative vote of at least 3 members, the commission requires the exclusion of the public.
Sec. 3. 1 MRSA §1008, sub-§1, as enacted by PL 1975, c. 621, §1, is further amended to read:
Sec. 4. 1 MRSA §1012, sub-§1, as repealed and replaced by PL 1989, c. 561, §4, is amended to read:
Sec. 5. 1 MRSA §1012, sub-§10 is enacted to read:
Sec. 6. 1 MRSA §1013, as amended by PL 1989, c. 561, §§5 and 6, is further amended to read:
§ 1013. Authority; procedures
(1) The Legislator against whom a complaint is filed must immediately be given a copy of the complaint and the name of the complainant.
(2) The commission shall consider only complaints against Legislators in office at the time of the filing of the complaint and only complaints relating to activity that occurred or was ongoing within 2 years of the complaint. Upon a majority vote of the commission, the commission shall conduct such an investigation and hold such hearings as it determines necessary. If one or more seats on the commission are vacant, the vote of 2 commissioners is sufficient to order an investigation and hearings.
(3) The commission shall issue its findings of fact together with its opinion regarding the alleged violation of legislative ethics to the legislative body of which the Legislator concerned is a member. That legislative body may take whatever action it determines appropriate, in accordance with the Constitution of Maine.
Any person whose name is mentioned in an investigation or hearing and who believes that testimony has been given which adversely affects him shall have the right to testify, or at the discretion of the commission and under such circumstances as the commission shall determine to protect the rights of the Legislator under inquiry, to file a statement of facts under oath relating solely to the material relevant to the testimony of which he complains. Any witness at an investigation or hearing, subject to rules and regulations promulgated by the commission, shall be entitled to a copy of such testimony when the same becomes relevant to a criminal proceeding or subsequent investigation or hearings.
All witnesses shall be sworn. The commission may sequester witnesses as it deems necessary. The commission shall not be is not bound by the strict rules of evidence, but its findings and opinions must be based upon competent and substantial evidence.
Time periods and notices may be waived by agreement of the commission and the person whose conduct is under inquiry.
Such an order shall does not preclude any other remedy available to the Legislator against whom the complaint has been filed, including, but not limited to, an action brought in Superior Court against the complainant for damages to his the Legislator's reputation.
Sec. 7. 1 MRSA §1014, as enacted by PL 1975, c. 621, §1, is amended to read:
§ 1014. Violations of legislative ethics
(1) Even in the excepted cases, an attorney or other professional person must refrain from references to his legislative capacity, from communications on legislative stationery and from threats or implications relating to legislative action.
(1) The appearance, representation or advocacy is provided without compensation and for the benefit of a constituent;
(2) The appearance, representation or advocacy is provided before a court or office of the Judicial Branch; or
(3) The representation consists of filing records, reports or performing other routine tasks that do not involve the exercise of discretion on the part of the agency or authority; and
Sec. 8. 1 MRSA §1015, as amended by PL 2005, c. 301, §3, is further amended to read:
§ 1015. Prohibited campaign contributions and solicitations
(1) Solicitations or contributions for bona fide social events hosted for nonpartisan, charitable purposes;
(2) Solicitations or contributions relating to a special election to fill a vacancy from the time of announcement of the election until the election;
(3) Solicitations or contributions after the deadline for filing as a candidate as provided in Title 21-A, section 335; and
(4) Solicitations or contributions accepted by a member of the Legislature supporting that member's campaign for federal office.
Sec. 9. Application. Notwithstanding the Maine Revised Statutes, Title 1, section 1013, subsection 2, paragraph H as amended by this Act, a complaint filed under Title 1, chapter 25, subchapter 2 prior to the effective date of this Act and subjected to a vote of the commission may not be refiled, and the conduct at issue in that complaint may not be challenged in any other complaint.
summary
This bill amends the legislative ethics laws, as recommended by a 15-member study group created during the Second Regular Session of the 122nd Legislature: the Presiding Officers’ Advisory Committee on Legislative Ethics. It broadens the definition of "conflict of interest" and increases protection against possible undue influence by Legislators. It also changes the workings of the Commission on Governmental Ethics and Election Practices to require that most commission proceedings on legislative ethics be conducted in public and to allow members of the public to file complaints regarding possible violations of legislative ethics laws. Finally, the bill rearranges, rewrites and edits several provisions of the law to make it easier to read and understand.
Under current law and rules of the Legislature, a Legislator is prohibited from voting on legislation on the grounds of conflict of interest only if the Legislator or certain family members or business associates would derive a unique and distinct benefit from the legislation. This bill proposes that a Legislator faces a conflict of interest in voting if the Legislator or an immediate family member or close economic associate of the Legislator would be benefited or harmed by the legislation to a degree that is significantly greater than similarly situated persons or entities or the Legislator, a member of the Legislator's immediate family or a close economic associate is a member of a small group of persons or entities that derive a significant benefit or harm from the proposed legislation.
The bill revises the limits on Legislators appearing before state agencies. Current law allows Legislators who are lawyers or other professional persons to represent clients before state agencies as long as they do not refer to their legislative capacity, but prohibits other Legislators from doing so. This bill prohibits a Legislator from representing a client before a state agency if the Legislator is a member of the joint standing committee with jurisdiction over that state agency. In such instances, a department and its staff would be more likely to know the identity of the Legislator and be influenced in their decision making by the Legislator's influence over the agency’s policies and budget. Exceptions to the prohibition are made for representation before courts, uncompensated representation for a constituent and representation involving only the agency’s ministerial, nondiscretionary functions. The intent of the bill is that the committee jurisdiction be determined by definition of the Legislature, including matters such as jurisdiction for purposes of referencing bills or for budget review by a policy committee.
The bill allows members of the public to file complaints alleging a violation of legislative ethics with the Commission on Governmental Ethics and Election Practices. A complaint must relate to a sitting Legislator but may refer to conduct that occurred within 2 years prior to the complaint. The bill requires the commission to conduct an initial review of all complaints in executive session to screen out frivolous or bad-faith accusations. If the commission does not have its full complement of 5 members, the bill proposes that a vote of 2 members would be sufficient to pursue a complaint. Once the commission votes to pursue a complaint, all commission meetings on the complaint must be conducted in public. Current law allows the commission to order a complainant to reimburse the subject of a complaint for costs incurred if the commission finds the complaint to be "groundless and without foundation." The bill changes the standard to "frivolous" complaints and those "filed in bad faith." These standards are more commonly used in courts and other situations. The bill allows a person to appeal a commission order under this provision pursuant to the Maine Administrative Procedure Act.
The bill provides that a complaint and most investigative records relating to the complaint are public records once the commission votes to pursue the complaint. If the commission votes not to pursue the complaint, the complaint and investigative records remain confidential. As under current law, the commission's findings of fact and recommendations are public records. The bill prohibits communication between commission members and a complainant or the subject of a complaint while a complaint is pending before the commission. It also requires the commission to make reasonable efforts to resolve a complaint within 90 days of its filing and replaces current process provisions with a requirement that the commission adopt rules regarding the conduct of its investigations and hearings.
The bill revises the structure of the legislative ethics laws to create a definition of "violation of legislative ethics" and to designate the term "conflict of interest" as referring specifically to conflicts regarding voting or advocating on legislation. Other violations of legislative ethics are specifically set out as under current law, such as "undue influence" and “abuse of position.” Rather than referring to these as "conflicts of interest," the bill classifies them as violations of legislative ethics. The law specifically authorizes the commission to hear complaints and make recommendations to the Senate and the House of Representatives regarding these violations of legislative ethics statutes.
The Presiding Officers' Advisory Committee on Legislative Ethics also proposed a number of changes to the Legislature's Joint Rules and the rules of the Senate and the House of Representatives relating to ethics and the process for addressing concerns about ethics. Recommendations for amendments to the rules, which are matters of internal procedure reserved for the House and Senate, will be presented separately from this bill to the Joint Select Committee on Joint Rules for their consideration.