|
based on the results of the DNA testing already conducted using the | standard set forth in this chapter if the DNA test results show | that the person is not the source of the evidence. |
|
| | 2.__Time for filing.__A motion under this section must be | filed by the later of: |
|
| A.__September 1, 2008, including a motion pertaining to | criminal proceedings in which DNA testing was conducted | before September 1, 2006; |
|
| B.__Two years after the date of conviction; and |
|
| C.__In cases in which the request for analysis is based on | the existence of new technology with respect to DNA analysis | that is capable of providing new material information, | within 2 years from the time that the technology became | commonly known and available. |
|
| | Sec. 2. 15 MRSA §2138, sub-§4, as enacted by PL 2001, c. 469, §1, is | repealed. |
|
| | Sec. 3. 15 MRSA §2138, sub-§4-A is enacted to read: |
|
| | 4-A.__Standard for ordering DNA analysis.__The court shall | order DNA analysis if a person authorized under section 2137 | presents prima facie evidence that: |
|
| A.__A sample of the evidence is available for DNA analysis; |
|
| B.__The evidence to be tested has been subject to a chain of | custody sufficient to establish that the evidence has not | been substituted, tampered with, replaced or altered in a | material way; |
|
| C.__The evidence was not previously subjected to DNA | analysis or, if previously analyzed, will be subject to DNA | analysis technology that was not available when the person | was convicted; |
|
| D.__The identity of the person as the perpetrator of the | crime that resulted in the conviction was at issue during | the person's trial; and |
|
| E.__The evidence sought to be analyzed, or the additional | information that the new technology is capable of providing | regarding evidence sought to be reanalyzed, is material to |
|
| the issue of whether the person is the perpetrator of, or | accomplice to, the crime that resulted in the conviction. |
|
|