| | 4. Itemized expenditures. An itemization of each expenditure | made to support or oppose any candidate, campaign, political | committee, political action committee, political party, | referendum or initiated petition, including the date, payee and | purpose of the expenditure and the address of the payee. If | expenditures were made to a person described in section 1012, | subsection 3, paragraph A, subparagraph (4), the report must | contain the name of the person; the amount spent by that person | on behalf of the candidate, campaign, political committee, | political action committee, political party, referendum or | initiated petition, including, but not limited to, expenditures | made during the signature gathering phase; the reason for the | expenditure; and the date of the expenditure. The commission may | specify the categories of expenditures that are to be reported to | enable the commission to closely monitor the activities of | political action committees; |
|
| | Sec. 8. Secretary of State to report on information provided to voters regarding | statewide referendum questions on ballot. By September 1, 2006, the | Secretary of State using existing budgeted resources shall issue | a report to the Joint Standing Committee on Legal and Veterans | Affairs that examines voter awareness in other states that mail | voter information pamphlets on statewide referendum questions | directly to voters. The report must include suggestions for | improving the way information is provided to voters regarding | statewide referendum questions in this State. |
|
| | Sec. 9. Commission on Governmental Ethics and Election Practices to report regarding | campaign finance reports for direct initiative campaigns and public access to those reports. | By September 1, 2006, the Commission on Governmental Ethics and | Election Practices shall issue a report to the Joint Standing | Committee on Legal and Veterans Affairs regarding campaign | finance reports for direct initiative campaigns. The report must | include the commission's examination of the feasibility of | requiring political action committees to identify the direct | initiative campaigns that the political action committees are | receiving or expending money in support of or opposition to, | whether voter information pamphlets or posters published by the | State and publications by political action committees in support | of or opposition to ballot measures should be required to include | information indicating where campaign finance reports about the | measure may be obtained, reducing the spending threshold that | triggers reporting as a political action committee and, in the | months prior to an election, increasing the frequency of reports | by political action committees that have raised or spent in | excess of $40,000 on a ballot measure. |
|
|