| | At common law, a partnership, not being a legal entity, could | not sue or be sued in the firm name. The UPA itself is silent on | this point, so in the absence of another enabling statute, it is | generally necessary to join all the partners in an action against | the partnership. |
|
| | Most States have statutes or rules authorizing partnerships to | sue or be sued in the partnership name. Many of those statutes, | however, are found in the state provisions dealing with civil | procedure rather than in the partnership act. |
|
| | 2. Subsection (b) provides that suit generally may be brought | against the partnership and any or all of the partners in the | same action or in separate actions. It is intended to clarify | that the partners need not be named in an action against the | partnership. In particular, in an action against a partnership, | it is not necessary to name a partner individually in addition to | the partnership. This will simplify and reduce the cost of | litigation, especially in cases of small claims where there are | known to be significant partnership assets and thus no necessity | to collect the judgment out of the partners' assets. |
|
| | Where the partnership is a limited liability partnership, the | limited liability partnership rules clarify that a partner not | liable for the alleged partnership obligation may not be named in | the action against the partnership unless the action also seeks | to establish personal liability of the partner for the | obligation. See subsections (b) and (d). |
|
| | 3. Subsection (c) provides that a judgment against the | partnership is not, standing alone, a judgment against the | partners, and it cannot be satisfied from a partner's personal | assets unless there is a judgment against the partner. Thus, a | partner must be individually named and served, either in the | action against the partnership or in a later suit, before his | personal assets may be subject to levy for a claim against the | partnership. |
|
| | RUPA leaves it to the law of judgments, as did the UPA, to | determine the collateral effects to be accorded a prior judgment | for or against the partnership in a subsequent action against a | partner individually. See Section 60 of the Second Restatement | of Judgments (1982) and the Comments thereto. |
|
| | 4. Subsection (d) requires partnership creditors to exhaust | the partnership's assets before levying on a judgment debtor | partner's individual property where the partner is personally | liable for the partnership obligation under Section 306. That | rule respects the concept of the partnership as an entity and | makes partners more in the nature of guarantors than principal |
|
|