LD 1609
pg. 35
Page 34 of 148 An Act To Establish the Uniform Partnership Act Page 36 of 148
Download Bill Text
LR 1469
Item 1

 
An unincorporated nonprofit organization is not a partnership
under RUPA, even if it qualifies as a business, because it is not
a "for profit" organization.

 
3. Subsection (c) provides three rules of construction that
apply in determining whether a partnership has been formed under
subsection (a). They are largely derived from UPA Section 7, and
to that extent no substantive change is intended. The sharing of
profits is recast as a rebuttable presumption of a partnership, a
more contemporary construction, rather than as prima facie
evidence thereof. The protected categories, in which receipt of
a share of the profits is not presumed to create a partnership,
apply whether the profit share is a single flat percentage or a
ratio which varies, for example, after reaching a dollar floor or
different levels of profits.

 
Like its predecessor, RUPA makes no attempt to answer in every
case whether a partnership is formed. Whether a relationship is
more properly characterized as that of borrower and lender,
employer and employee, or landlord and tenant is left to the
trier of fact. As under the UPA, a person may function in both
partner and nonpartner capacities.

 
Paragraph (3)(v) adds a new protected category to the list.
It shields from the presumption a share of the profits received
in payment of interest or other charges on a loan, "including a
direct or indirect present or future ownership in the collateral,
or rights to income, proceeds, or increase in value derived from
the collateral." The quoted language is taken from Section 211
of the Uniform Land Security Interest Act. The purpose of the
new language is to protect shared-appreciation mortgages,
contingent or other variable or performance-related mortgages,
and other equity participation arrangements by clarifying that
contingent payments do not presumptively convert lending
arrangements into partnerships.

 
4. Section 202(e) of the 1993 Act stated that partnerships
formed under RUPA are general partnerships and that the partners
are general partners. That section has been deleted as
unnecessary. Limited partners are not "partners" within the
meaning of RUPA, however.

 
§1023.__Partnership property

 
Property acquired by a partnership is property of the
partnership and not of the partners individually.

 
Comment

 
(This is Section 203 of the Uniform Partnership Act (1997).)


Page 34 of 148 Top of Page Page 36 of 148