LD 1609
pg. 26
Page 25 of 148 An Act To Establish the Uniform Partnership Act Page 27 of 148
Download Bill Text
LR 1469
Item 1

 
is treated as an amendment, even if not so denominated. Any
substantive conflict between filed statements operates as a
cancellation of authority under Section 303.

 
§1006.__Governing law

 
1.__Partnership.__Except as otherwise provided in a filed
statement, in a written partnership agreement or in subsection 2,
the law of the jurisdiction in which a partnership has its chief
executive office governs relations among the partners and between
the partners and the partnership.

 
2.__Limited liability partnership.__The law of this State
governs relations among the partners and between the partners and
the partnership and the liability of partners for an obligation
of a limited liability partnership.

 
Comment

 
(This is Section 106 of the Uniform Partnership Act (1997).)

 
The subsection (a) internal relations rule is new. Cf. RULPA
§ 901 (internal affairs governed by law of State in which limited
partnership organized).

 
RUPA looks to the jurisdiction in which a partnership's chief
executive office is located to provide the law governing the
internal relations among the partners and between the partners
and the partnership. The concept of the partnership's "chief
executive office" is drawn from UCC Section 9103(3)(d). It was
chosen in lieu of the State of organization because no filing is
necessary to form a general partnership, and thus the situs of
its organization is not always clear, unlike a limited
partnership, which is organized in the State where its
certificate is filed.

 
The term "chief executive office" is not defined in the Act,
nor is it defined in the UCC. Paragraph 5 of the Official
Comment to UCC Section 9103(3)(d) explains:

 
"Chief executive office" . . . means the place from which in
fact the debtor manages the main part of his business
operations. . . . Doubt may arise as to which is the
"chief executive office" of a multi-state enterprise, but it
would be rare that there could be more than two
possibilities. . . . [The rule] will be simple to apply in
most cases. . . .

 
In the absence of any other clear rule for determining a
partnership's legal situs, it seems convenient to use that
rule for choice of law purposes as well.


Page 25 of 148 Top of Page Page 27 of 148