|
is treated as an amendment, even if not so denominated. Any | substantive conflict between filed statements operates as a | cancellation of authority under Section 303. |
|
| | 1.__Partnership.__Except as otherwise provided in a filed | statement, in a written partnership agreement or in subsection 2, | the law of the jurisdiction in which a partnership has its chief | executive office governs relations among the partners and between | the partners and the partnership. |
|
| | 2.__Limited liability partnership.__The law of this State | governs relations among the partners and between the partners and | the partnership and the liability of partners for an obligation | of a limited liability partnership. |
|
| | (This is Section 106 of the Uniform Partnership Act (1997).) |
|
| | The subsection (a) internal relations rule is new. Cf. RULPA | § 901 (internal affairs governed by law of State in which limited | partnership organized). |
|
| | RUPA looks to the jurisdiction in which a partnership's chief | executive office is located to provide the law governing the | internal relations among the partners and between the partners | and the partnership. The concept of the partnership's "chief | executive office" is drawn from UCC Section 9103(3)(d). It was | chosen in lieu of the State of organization because no filing is | necessary to form a general partnership, and thus the situs of | its organization is not always clear, unlike a limited | partnership, which is organized in the State where its | certificate is filed. |
|
| | The term "chief executive office" is not defined in the Act, | nor is it defined in the UCC. Paragraph 5 of the Official | Comment to UCC Section 9103(3)(d) explains: |
|
| "Chief executive office" . . . means the place from which in | fact the debtor manages the main part of his business | operations. . . . Doubt may arise as to which is the | "chief executive office" of a multi-state enterprise, but it | would be rare that there could be more than two | possibilities. . . . [The rule] will be simple to apply in | most cases. . . . |
|
| In the absence of any other clear rule for determining a | partnership's legal situs, it seems convenient to use that | rule for choice of law purposes as well. |
|
|