| This section partially follows and partially rejects the UPA |
(1973) requirements regarding who must be named as parties in a |
parentage proceeding. First, contra to UPA (1973), the child is |
not a necessary party. Few states require children as necessary |
parties. Further, with the widespread use of DNA testing, such a |
requirement has outlived its usefulness. On the other hand, |
failure to join a child as a party may later result in a child's |
successful collateral attack on the original determination of |
paternity to be filed by the child. This subject is discussed |
more fully in the comment to § 637, infra. |