|
(1) the 99% standard reflects the current standard of the American | Association of Blood Banks (Standards for Parentage Testing | Laboratories, 4th ed. 1999), and the proposed standards (5th ed. | 2001); |
|
| (2) the standards promulgated by the various accrediting bodies | (American Association of Blood Banks and the American Society for | Histocompatibility and Immunogenetics) will, in reality, set the | benchmark for genetic testing; |
|
| (3) the 99% standard is consistent with the standards of the | plurality of American jurisdictions as of December, 2000; |
|
| (4) a standard higher than 99% could cause evidentiary problems | in probate proceedings because of degraded specimens. Similarly, | that problem may arise in cases involving one or more missing | individuals, e.g., the mother is not available, but the child and | alleged father are available; |
|
| (5) the percentage is an evidentiary presumption that the | respondent may always challenge by requesting a second test under | §507; and |
|
| (6) a proceeding to adjudicate paternity is a civil action based | on a preponderance of the evidence, not a criminal action based | on evidence beyond reasonable doubt. |
|
| §1906.__Costs of genetic testing |
|
| | 1.__Costs advanced.__Subject to assessment of costs under | subchapter 6, the cost of initial genetic testing must be | advanced: |
|
| A.__By a support enforcement agency in a proceeding in which | the support enforcement agency is providing services; |
|
| B.__By the individual who made the request; |
|
| C.__As agreed by the parties; or |
|
| D.__As ordered by the court. |
|
| | 2.__Reimbursement.__In cases in which the cost is advanced by | the support enforcement agency, the agency may seek reimbursement | from a man who is rebuttably identified as the father. |
|
|