| If a state chooses to enact subsection (b)(2), one of the |
major criticisms of Lehr v. Robertson, supra, will be eliminated. |
In Lehr, although the genetic father did not avail himself of the |
New York putative fathers registry, he had filed a "visitation |
and paternity" petition in another local court. The trial judge |
in the adoption proceeding knew the identity of the biological |
father, where he could be located, and that he was seeking to |
establish his paternity in another court. Nonetheless, the court |
granted the adoption and terminated the genetic father's parental |
rights without notice to him. Subsection (b)(2) exempts an |
alleged father from the requirement of registration if the man |
"commences a proceeding to adjudicate his paternity before the |
court has terminated his parental rights." |