|
ensure that the forms comply with PRWORA, OCSE-AT-98-02, Required | Data Elements for Paternity Acknowledgment Affidavits, | http://www.acf.dhhs.gov/programs/cse/1998-at.htm |
|
| §1863.__Release of information |
|
| | The State Registrar of Vital Statistics may release | information relating to the acknowledgment of paternity as | provided in Title 22, section 2706. |
|
| §1864.__Adoption of rules |
|
| | The State Registrar of Vital Statistics may adopt rules to | implement this subchapter.__Rules adopted pursuant to this | section are routine technical rules for the purposes of Title 5, | chapter 375, subchapter 2-A. |
|
| | (This is section 314 of the UPA.) |
|
| | This section is bracketed to account for situations in which | it may conflict with other rulemaking limitations in a particular | state. States will implement voluntary acknowledgment of | paternity procedures in a variety of ways, depending on local | practice. This grant of rulemaking authority to carry out the | provisions of this article may include electronic transmission of | birth and acknowledgment data to the designated state agency. |
|
| | In Lehr v. Robertson, 463 U.S. 248 (1983), the Supreme Court | upheld the constitutionality of a New York "putative father | registry." A New York statute required a father of a child born | out-of-wedlock to register if he wished to be notified of a | termination of parental rights or adoption proceeding. | Thereafter, a series of well-publicized adoption cases occurred | in which state courts held that nonmarital fathers had not been | given proper notice of such proceedings and voided established | adoptions. A substantial number of legislatures responded to | these decisions by enacting paternity registries similar to the | New York statute. As of May, 2000, at least 28 states had enacted | legislation creating paternity registries. |
|
| | Initially, in 1988 the Conference took a much different view, | stating: |
|
|