| Finally, subsection (b) is a complete rewrite of UPA (1973) § |
4(b). The requirement that a presumption "may be rebutted only by |
clear and convincing evidence" was eliminated from the Act. The |
same fate was accorded the statement that: "If two or more |
presumptions arise which conflict with each other, the |
presumption which on the facts is founded on the weightier |
considerations of policy and logic controls." Nowadays the |
existence of modern genetic testing obviates this old approach to |
the problem of conflicting presumptions when a court is to |
determine paternity. Nowadays, genetic testing makes it possible |
in most cases to resolve competing claims to paternity. Moreover, |
courts may use the estoppel principles in § 608 in appropriate |
circumstances to deny requests for genetic testing in the |
interests of preserving a child's ties to the presumed or |
acknowledged father who openly held himself out as the child's |
father regardless of whether he is in fact the genetic father. |