| Be it enacted by the People of the State of Maine as follows: |
|
| | The National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws | has addressed the subject of parentage throughout the 20th | Century. In 1922, the Conference promulgated the "Uniform | Illegitimacy Act," followed by the "Uniform Blood Tests To | Determine Paternity Act" in 1952, the "Uniform Paternity Act" in | 1960, and certain provisions in the "Uniform Probate Code" in | 1969. The "Uniform Illegitimacy Act" was withdrawn by the | Conference and none of the other Acts were widely adopted. As of | June 1973, the Blood Tests to Determine Paternity Act had been | enacted in nine states, the "Uniform Paternity Act" in four, and | the "Uniform Probate Code" in five. |
|
| | The most important uniform act addressing the status of the | nonmarital child was the Uniform Parentage Act approved in 1973 | [hereinafter referred to as UPA (1973)]. As of December, 2000, | UPA (1973) was in effect in 19 states stretching from Delaware to | California; in addition, many other states have enacted | significant portions of it. Among the many notable features of | this landmark Act was the declaration that all children should be | treated equally without regard to marital status of the parents. | In addition, the Act established a set of rules for presumptions | of parentage, shunned the term "illegitimate," and chose instead | to employ the term "child with no presumed father." |
|
| | UPA (1973) had its genesis in a law review article, Harry D. | Krause, A Proposed Uniform Act on Legitimacy, 44 Tex. L. Rev. 829 | (1966); see also Krause, Equal Protection for the Illegitimate, | 65 Mich. L. Rev. 477 (1967). Professor Krause followed with a | pathfinding book, Illegitimacy: Law and Social Policy (1971), and | then went on to serve as the reporter for UPA (1973). When work | on the Act began, the notion of substantive legal equality of | children regardless of the marital status of their parents seemed | revolutionary. Even though the Conference had put itself on | record in favor of equal rights of support and inheritance in the | Paternity Act and the Probate Code, the law of many states | continued to differentiate very significantly in the legal | treatment of marital and nonmarital children. A series of United | States Supreme Court decisions invalidating state inheritance, | custody, and tort laws that disadvantaged out-of-wedlock children | provided both the impetus and a receptive climate for the | Conference to promulgate UPA (1973). |
|
|