LD 1844
pg. 9
Page 8 of 10 An Act To Amend the Maine Criminal Code and Motor Vehicle Laws as Recommended b... Page 10 of 10
Download Bill Text
LR 2693
Item 1

 
The bill also addresses forfeiture of firearms in the context
of the conviction under Title 15, section 393. The other
person's burden is satisfied by proof by a preponderance of the
evidence that, at the time of the commission of the crime, the
person had a right to possess the firearm to the exclusion of the
defendant and the person either did not know or should not have
known that the defendant was a prohibited person under Title 15,
section 393 or, even if the other person did know or should have
known, nonetheless did not intentionally, knowingly or recklessly
allow the defendant to possess or have under the defendant's
control the firearm. This burden imposed upon the other person
is greater than under Title 17-A, section 1158.

 
The bill also addresses forfeiture of a handgun used by the
defendant or an accomplice during the commission of murder or any
other unlawful homicide crime. The other person's burden is
satisfied by proof by a preponderance of the evidence that, at
the time of the commission of the crime, the other person was the
rightful owner from whom the handgun had been stolen and the
other person was not a principal or an accomplice in the
commission of the crime. It also defines "handgun" for purposes
of Title 17-A, section 1158-A.

 
The bill replaces Title 17-A, section 1202, subsection 1-B in
order to address the constitutional defect revealed in the recent
case of State v. Hodgkins, 2003 ME 57, 822 A.2d 1187. The bill
also eliminates the necessity of the State's pleading and the
jury's having to find that the Class D or Class E crime involved
"domestic violence" by specifically enumerating the Class D or
Class E crimes that automatically qualify and by having the State
plead and the jury find that the qualifying crime was committed
by the person "against a family or household member," as defined
in Title 19-A, section 4002, subsection 4. The bill also makes
clear that imposition of the extended period of probation is
further conditioned upon the court's ordering the person to
complete a certified batterers' intervention program as defined
in Title 19-A, section 4014. This precondition is necessary
because only one program currently exists for female defendants,
and a program may not be reasonably available for certain male
defendants. The bill also clarifies that termination of the
extended probation period requires a judicial finding that the
probationer has served at least one year of probation, has
successfully completed a certified batterers' program and has met
all other conditions of probation.

 
The bill is intended to make clear that in the event there is
a failure by the State to comply with the time limits set forth
in Title 17-A, section 1205-C, a court may, but is not required
to, issue an order that, pending initial appearance, the
probationer be released on personal recognizance.


Page 8 of 10 Top of Page Page 10 of 10