| In addition to the MCJUSTIS formatting changes, Public Law |
| 2001, chapter 383 identified several drafting changes that were |
| substantive in nature and necessary to accomplish the MCJUSTIS |
| policy board's directive. These changes also apply in this bill. |
| Specifically, the category of substantive changes that are |
| necessary relates to how to handle facts about a crime that are |
| not technically elements of the crime but are currently used for |
| determining the class of crime for sentencing purposes. The |
| statute currently does not require that such "enhancers" be |
| proved beyond a reasonable doubt by the prosecution. The Law |
| Court has required, however, that the prosecution must prove such |
| facts beyond a reasonable doubt if the facts are to be used to |
| make the underlying crime a higher class than it would otherwise |
| be or would require a specific punishment. This bill |
| incorporates each enhancer into the elements of the crime that it |
| enhances. This results in the statutory requirement that the |
| enhancer be proved beyond a reasonable doubt in order to secure a |
| conviction for that crime at that class. The enhancers that this |
| bill includes are for prior convictions. When a person has a |
| prior conviction for committing the same or another crime, that |
| prior conviction may sometimes be used to enhance the penalty, |
| but the State must plead and prove to a jury that the prior |
| conviction did occur, instead of the court making that |
| determination in order to enhance a crime at the point of |
| sentencing. |