LD 1547
pg. 7
Page 6 of 8 An Act To Amend Certain Laws Administered by the Department of Environmental Pr... Page 8 of 8
Download Bill Text
LR 1860
Item 1

 
Sec. 28. Effective date. That section of this Act that amends the
Maine Revised Statutes, Title 38, section 570, first paragraph,
as repealed and replaced by Public Law 1987, chapter 735, section
72, takes effect December 31, 2005 2010.

 
Sec. 21. PL 1991, c. 817, §30, as amended by PL 1997, c. 374, §16, is
further amended to read:

 
Sec. 30. Effective date. That section of this Act that amends the
Maine Revised Statutes, Title 38, section 570, first paragraph,
as amended by Public Law 1989, chapter 865, section 17 and
affected by sections 24 and 25, is repealed December 31, 2005
2010.

 
SUMMARY

 
This bill corrects an inadvertent error and inconsistency
created last session when the open burning statute was amended.

 
It increases the cap on allocations for the Board of
Environmental Protection Fund within the Department of
Environmental Protection from $250,000 annually to $325,000
annually to meet rising personnel salary and benefit costs for
the next several years, including the filling of the Executive
Analyst position in the past biennium, and a rise in operating
costs, due to a modest increase in general workload from broader
public involvement in the licensing and appeal processes, which
has resulted in more frequent meetings of the board. The last
increase in the allocation cap was in 1997.

 
It clarifies the statute governing the Department of
Environmental Protection's enforcement authority. The Maine
Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 80K allows the department and
municipalities to prosecute environmental violations in District
Court. Municipalities consistently have 80K actions commenced by
both certified nonlawyer code enforcement officers and town
attorneys. The department has historically not had employees who
are also licensed active members of the bar file cases on the
department's behalf since the rule is ambiguous as to whether
such a practice is appropriate. This change in the law makes
clear that a department practice consistent with current
municipal practices is appropriate.

 
It repeals the enabling language for the requirement of
priority studies because the tasks described in the statute have
been completed and the project is no longer active.

 
It clarifies that an action in court can not be determined to
start at any point prior to compliance with court rules. The


Page 6 of 8 Top of Page Page 8 of 8