(3) After December 31, 2002, a mill may not |
discharge dioxin into its receiving waters. For |
purposes of this subparagraph, a mill is considered |
to have discharged dioxin into its receiving waters |
if 2, 3, 7, 8 - tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin or 2, 3, |
7, 8 - tetrachlorodibenzo-p-furan is detected in any |
of the mill's internal waste streams of its bleach |
plant and in a confirmatory sample at levels |
exceeding 10 picograms per liter, unless the |
department adopts a lower detection level by rule, |
which is a routine technical rule pursuant to Title |
5, chapter 375, subchapter II-A 2-A, or a lower |
detection level by incorporation of a method in use |
by the United States Environmental Protection Agency, |
or if levels of dioxin, as defined in section 420-A, |
subsection 1 detected in fish tissue sampled below |
the mill's wastewater outfall are higher than levels |
in fish tissue sampled at an upstream reference site |
not affected by the mill's discharge or on the basis |
of a comparable surrogate procedure acceptable to the |
commissioner. The commissioner shall consult with |
the technical advisory group established in section |
420-B, subsection 1, paragraph B, subparagraph (5) in |
making this determination and in evaluating surrogate |
procedures. The fish-tissue sampling test must be |
performed with differences between the average |
concentrations of dioxin in the fish samples taken |
upstream and downstream from the mill measured with |
at least 95% statistical confidence. If the mill |
fails to meet the fish-tissue sampling-result |
requirements in this subparagraph and does not |
demonstrate by December 31, 2003 2004 and annually |
thereafter to the commissioner's satisfaction that |
its wastewater discharge is not the source of |
elevated dioxin concentrations in fish below the |
mill, then the commissioner may pursue any remedy |
authorized by law. |