The effect of this provision is to reaffirm state authority |
over matters of contract by making clear that UETA is the |
controlling law if there is a conflict between this Act and |
the federal E-sign law, except for E-sign's consumer consent |
provisions (Section 101(c) and its notice provisions (Section |
103(b) (which have no substantive impact on this Act). Among |
other things, such clarification assures that agreements |
related to mediation - such as the agreement to mediate and |
the subsequently mediated settlement agreement - may not be |
challenged on the basis of a conflict between this Act and the |
federal E-sign law. Such challenges should be dismissed |
summarily by the courts. |