LD 1218
pg. 88
Page 87 of 94 An Act To Enact the Revised Uniform Arbitration Act Page 89 of 94
Download Bill Text
LR 468
Item 1

 
Communicats. Intn'l Union, 727 A.2d 890, 891 (D.C. Ct. App.
1999); Guider v. McIntosh, 293 Ill.App. 3d 935, 689 N.E.2d 231, 233, 228
Ill.Dec. 359 (1997); FCR Greensboro, Inc. v. C & M Investments
of High Point, Inc., 119 N.C.App. 575, 459 S.E.2d 292, 295,
cert. denied, 341 N.C. 648, 462 S.E.2d 510 (1995); Rademaker v.
Atlas Assur Co., 98 Ohio App. 15, 120 N.E.2d 592, 596 (1954).
Section 25(a) and (c) includes a provision to enter judgment or
award attorney's fees when there is an order "vacating without
directing a rehearing." The terms "without directing a
rehearing" were added because an order of vacatur is a final one
and subject to appeal under Section 28(a)(5) if the court does
not order a rehearing under Section 23(c).

 
2. Some of the language in UAA Section 15 on judgment rolls
and docketing has been rewritten and incorporated into Section
25(a) that the judgment may be "recorded, docketed, and
enforced as any other judgment in a civil action" both to
delete what in some States would be considered archaic
procedure under UAA Section 15 and to allow States more
flexibility in recording judgments according to the procedures
in their States.

 
3. Section 25(c) promotes the statutory policy of finality
of arbitration awards by adding a provision for recovery of
reasonable attorney's fees and reasonable expenses of
litigation to prevailing parties in contested judicial actions
to confirm, vacate, modify or correct an award. Potential
liability for the opposing parties' post-award litigation
expenditures will tend to discourage all but the most
meritorious challenges of arbitration awards. If a party
prevails in a contested judicial proceeding over an
arbitration award, Section 25(c) allows the court discretion
to award attorney's fees and litigation expenses. Blitz v.
Bath Isaac Adas Israel Congregation, 352 Md. 31, 720 A.2d 912
(1998) (permitting award of attorney's fees in both the trial
and appeal of an action to confirm and enforce an arbitration
award against party who refused to comply with it).

 
4. The right to recover post-award litigation expenses does
not apply if a party's resistance to the award is entirely
passive but only where there is "a contested judicial
proceeding." The situation of an uncontested judicial
proceeding, e.g., to confirm an arbitration award, will most
often occur when a party simply cannot pay an amount awarded.
If a party lacks the ability to comply with the award and does
not resist a motion to confirm the award, the subsection does
not impose further liability for the prevailing party's fees
and expenses. These expenditures should be nominal in a
situation in which a motion to confirm is made but not
opposed. This is consistent with the general policy of most
States, which does not allow a
prevailing party to recover legal fees and most expenses
associated with executing a judgment.


Page 87 of 94 Top of Page Page 89 of 94