LD 1218
pg. 60
Page 59 of 94 An Act To Enact the Revised Uniform Arbitration Act Page 61 of 94
Download Bill Text
LR 468
Item 1

 
the parties. Because Section 17(c) is waivable under Section 4
(a), the provision is intended to encourage parties to negotiate
their own discovery procedures. Section 17(d) establishes the
authority of the arbitrator to oversee the prehearing process
and enforce discovery-related orders in the same manner as would
occur in a civil action, thereby minimizing the involvement of
(and resort of the parties to) the courts during the arbitral
discovery process.

 
At the same time, it should be clear that in many arbitrations
discovery is unnecessary and that the discovery contemplated
by Section 17(c) and (d) is not coextensive with that which
occurs in the course of civil litigation under federal or
state rules of civil procedure. Although Section 17(c) allows
an arbitrator to permit discovery so that parties can obtain
necessary information, the intent of the language is to limit
that discovery by considerations of fairness, efficiency, and
cost. Because Section 17(c) is subject to the parties'
arbitration agreement, they can decide to eliminate or limit
discovery as best suits their needs. However, the default
standard of Section 17(c) is meant to discourage most forms of
discovery in arbitration.

 
4. The simplified, straightforward approach to discovery
reflected in Section 17(c)-(e) is premised on the affirmative
duty of the parties to cooperate in the prompt and efficient
completion of discovery. The standard for decision in
particular cases is left to the arbitrator. The intent of
Section 17, similar to Section 8(b) which allows arbitrators
to issue provisional remedies, is to grant arbitrators the
power and flexibility to ensure that the discovery process is
fair and expeditious.

 
5. In Section 17 most of the references involve "parties to
the arbitration proceeding." However, sometimes arbitrations
involve outside, third parties who may be required to give
testimony or produce documents. Section 17(c) provides that
the arbitrator should take the interests of such "affected
persons" into account in determining whether and to what
extent discovery is appropriate. Section 17(b) has been
broadened so that a "witness" who is not a party can request
the arbitrator to allow that person's testimony to be
presented at the hearing by deposition if that person is
unable to attend the hearing.

 
6. Section 17(d) explicitly states that if an arbitrator
allows discovery, the arbitrator has the authority to issue
subpoenas for a discovery proceeding such as a deposition.
This issue has become particularly important as a result of
the holding in
COMSAT Corp. v. National Science Foundation, 190 F.3d 269 (4th
Cir. 1999), in which the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals


Page 59 of 94 Top of Page Page 61 of 94