LD 1020
pg. 9
Page 8 of 11 An Act To Amend the Maine Criminal Code as Recommended by the Criminal Law Advi... Page 10 of 11
Download Bill Text
LR 811
Item 1

 
Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000), which held that
sentencing factors increasing punishment beyond the maximum
authorized must be treated as elements of crimes to be pleaded
and proved beyond a reasonable doubt rather than as sentencing
factors. Since the "heinousness" standard can be interpreted as
increasing the maximum punishment of up to 20 years to the
"expanded range" of 20 to 40 years, it is potentially
unconstitutional absent legislative correction.

 
The new Title 17-A, section 1252, subsection 2, paragraph A
eliminates the constitutional doubts by replacing the 2-tier
system with a single sentencing range, while preserving the
Supreme Judicial Court's discretion to establish and enforce,
through appellate review, sentencing factors that avoid
excessively harsh sentences. It is not intended that this
change modify current sentencing practices.

 
Section 12 clarifies that if the State pleads and proves
that an actor has 2 or more prior convictions for stalking
under the Maine Revised Statutes, Title 17-A, section 210-A,
the State may not plead and prove further sentencing class
enhancement under Title 17-A, section 1252.

 
Effective January 1, 2004, section 13 eliminates the current
requirement under the Maine Revised Statutes, Title 17-A,
section 1252-B that deductions for good time and meritorious
good time be taken into consideration when a sentencing
alternative involving imprisonment is requested or recommended
by a party or imposed by a court.

 
In 1988 the 113th Legislature enacted the Maine Revised
Statutes, Title 17-A, section 1252-B, which for the first time
expressly precluded a sentencing court from ignoring
administrative awards for good time and meritorious good time
in the sentencing decision and instead required that such
awards be considered. See Public Law 1987, chapter 808,
section 2.

 
Seven years later, in 1995, the 117th Legislature enacted
the Maine Revised Statutes, Title 17-A, section 1253,
subsection 8, which on or after October 1, 1995 markedly
reduced the statutory deductions for good time and meritorious
good time authorized under that same section. See Public Law
1995, chapter 433, section 4. The resulting disparity in an
administrative award of good time and meritorious good time
for persons committing crimes prior to October 1, 1995 and for
persons committing crimes on and after that date is
illustrated by the following: A person who committed a crime
before October 1, 1995, and subsequently was sentenced to a
term of imprisonment of more than 6 months, and receives
maximum deductions under section 1253, subsections 3, 4 and 5,
or about 180 days a year, will serve about 57% of the term of
imprisonment. A person who


Page 8 of 11 Top of Page Page 10 of 11