|
with a local tribunal and seek protection from that tribunal | pending resolution of the contest. This may be accomplished | through the obligor's employment of private counsel or by a | request for services made to the child support enforcement | agency of the responding State. Some States provide | administrative procedures for challenging the income withholding | that may provide quicker resolution of a dispute than a | judicially-based registration and hearing process. In the | absence of expeditious action by the employee to assert a | defense and contest the direct filing of a notice for | withholding, however, the employer must begin income withholding | in a timely fashion. |
|
| In contrast to the multiple-order system of RURESA, another | issue the employee-obligor may raise is that the withholding | order received by the employer is not based on the controlling | child support order issued by the tribunal with continuing, | exclusive jurisdiction, see Section 207, supra. Such a claim | does not constitute a defense to the obligation of child | support, but does put at issue the identity of the order to | which the employer must respond. Clearly the employer is in no | position to make such a decision. When multiple orders involve | the same employee-obligor and child, as a practical matter | resort to a responding tribunal to resolve a dispute over | apportionment almost certainly is necessary. |
|
| | Sec. 33. 19-A MRSA §3102, sub-§1, as enacted by PL 1995, c. 694, Pt. | B, §2 and affected by Pt. E, §2, is amended to read: |
|
| | 1. Documents to state information agency. A party residing | in another state or support enforcement agency seeking to | enforce a support order or an income-withholding order, or | both, issued by a tribunal of another state shall send the | documents required for registering the order to the | department. |
|
| (This is Section 507 of the Uniform Act.) |
|
| This section authorizes summary enforcement of an interstate | child support order through the administrative means available | for intrastate orders. Under Subsection (a), an interested | party in another State, which necessarily may include a | private attorney or a support enforcement agency, may forward | a support order or income-withholding order to a support | enforcement agency of the responding State. The term | "responding State" in this context does not necessarily | contemplate resort to a | tribunal as an initial step. |
|
| Subsection (b) directs the support enforcement agency in the | responding State to employ that State's regular administrative |
|
|