LD 986
pg. 56
Page 55 of 77 An Act To Enact the Uniform Interstate Family Support Act Amendments of 1996 an... Page 57 of 77
Download Bill Text
LR 467
Item 1

 
with a local tribunal and seek protection from that tribunal
pending resolution of the contest. This may be accomplished
through the obligor's employment of private counsel or by a
request for services made to the child support enforcement
agency of the responding State. Some States provide
administrative procedures for challenging the income withholding
that may provide quicker resolution of a dispute than a
judicially-based registration and hearing process. In the
absence of expeditious action by the employee to assert a
defense and contest the direct filing of a notice for
withholding, however, the employer must begin income withholding
in a timely fashion.

 
In contrast to the multiple-order system of RURESA, another
issue the employee-obligor may raise is that the withholding
order received by the employer is not based on the controlling
child support order issued by the tribunal with continuing,
exclusive jurisdiction, see Section 207, supra. Such a claim
does not constitute a defense to the obligation of child
support, but does put at issue the identity of the order to
which the employer must respond. Clearly the employer is in no
position to make such a decision. When multiple orders involve
the same employee-obligor and child, as a practical matter
resort to a responding tribunal to resolve a dispute over
apportionment almost certainly is necessary.

 
Sec. 33. 19-A MRSA §3102, sub-§1, as enacted by PL 1995, c. 694, Pt.
B, §2 and affected by Pt. E, §2, is amended to read:

 
1. Documents to state information agency. A party residing
in another state or support enforcement agency seeking to
enforce a support order or an income-withholding order, or
both, issued by a tribunal of another state shall send the
documents required for registering the order to the
department.

 
Uniform Comment

 
(This is Section 507 of the Uniform Act.)

 
This section authorizes summary enforcement of an interstate
child support order through the administrative means available
for intrastate orders. Under Subsection (a), an interested
party in another State, which necessarily may include a
private attorney or a support enforcement agency, may forward
a support order or income-withholding order to a support
enforcement agency of the responding State. The term
"responding State" in this context does not necessarily
contemplate resort to a
tribunal as an initial step.

 
Subsection (b) directs the support enforcement agency in the
responding State to employ that State's regular administrative


Page 55 of 77 Top of Page Page 57 of 77