LD 986
pg. 53
Page 52 of 77 An Act To Enact the Uniform Interstate Family Support Act Amendments of 1996 an... Page 54 of 77
Download Bill Text
LR 467
Item 1

 
does not permit such orders to be issued when another support
order exists, thereby prohibiting a second tribunal from
establishing another support order and the accompanying
continuing, exclusive jurisdiction over the matter, see Sections
205 and 206.

 
The 2001 rewording of Subsection (b) conforms the language to
the provisions of the UNIFORM PARENTAGE ACT (2000) regarding
the individual party who may be ordered to pay temporary
support.

 
Sec. 29. 19-A MRSA §3101, as repealed and replaced by PL 1997, c.
669, §20, is amended to read:

 
§3101. Employer's receipt of out-of-state income-withholding

 
order

 
An income-withholding order issued in another state may be
sent by or on behalf of the obligee or by the department to
the obligor's employer, described as a payor of income under
chapter 65, subchapter IV 4, without first filing a petition
or comparable pleading or registering the order with a
tribunal of this State.

 
Uniform Comment

 
(This is Section 501 of the Uniform Act.)

 
In 1984 Congress mandated that all States adopt procedures for
enforcing income-withholding orders of sister States. Direct
recognition by the out-of-state obligor's employer of a
withholding order issued by another State long was sought by
support enforcement associations and other advocacy groups. In
1992 UIFSA recognized such a procedure. The article was
extensively amended in 1996, but was the subject only of
clarifying amendments in 2001.

 
Section 501 is deliberately written in the passive voice; the
Act does not restrict those who may send an income-withholding
order across state lines. Although the sender will ordinarily
be a child support enforcement agency or the obligee, the
obligor or any other person may supply an employer with the
income-withholding order. "Sending a copy" of a withholding
order to an employer is clearly distinguishable from "service"
of that order on the same employer. Service of an order
necessarily intends to invoke a tribunal's authority over an
employer doing business in the State. Thus, for there to be
valid "service" of a withholding order on an employer in a
State, the tribunal must
have authority to bind the employer. In most cases, this
requires the assertion of the authority of a local responding
tribunal in a "registration for enforcement" proceeding. In
short, the


Page 52 of 77 Top of Page Page 54 of 77