|
nominally concerned with insuring that payments made on a | particular order were credited toward the amounts due on all | other orders. As a practical matter, however, very little | attention was paid to that provision. No mechanism was available | to reconcile payments on multiple orders other than the | obligor's record keeping, if any. |
|
| Quite a different situation is currently in place throughout | the nation. The advent and development of IV-D agencies has | brought collection of arrears and interest on those arrears to | the forefront. Computerized exchange of complex information is | now almost instantaneously available in many cases. Thus, | deciphering the financial information available to accord | credit for payment on one order against other orders is | possible to a degree unknown in the days of RURESA. For | example, full payment of $300 on an order of State C earns a | 100% pro tanto discharge of the current support owed on a $200 | order of State A, and a 75% credit against a $400 order of | State B. Crediting payments against arrears on multiple orders | is more complex, and is subject to different constructions in | various states. |
|
| Under the one-order system of UIFSA, an obligor ultimately | will be ordered to pay only one sum-certain amount for current | support, and a sum certain to reduce arrears and interest, if | any. Nonetheless, multiple orders will exist for several years | into the future. Moreover, even under a one-order system, more | than one entity may be engaged in collecting past arrears. | Ultimately those collections must be reported to a single | entity with final accounting responsibility. Finally, because | the nature of human enterprise is such that mistakes are | inevitable, at least on occasion multiple orders will continue | to be issued in error. |
|
| The issuing tribunal is ultimately responsible for the overall | control of the enforcement methods employed and for accounting | for the payments made on its order from multiple sources. | Until that scheme is fully in place, however, it will be | necessary to continue to mandate pro tanto credit for actual | payments made against all existing orders. |
|
| The rewording of this section in 2001 reaffirms the | simultaneous accrual and simultaneous credit approach, and | provides further substance to the directive in Section 207(f) | that a tribunal making a determination of the consolidated | arrears must use this approach. |
|
| §2970.__Application of chapter to nonresident subject to | personal |
|
|